Comparison Overview

BMS Direct, Inc.

VS

DMP BPO

BMS Direct, Inc.

37 Millrace Drive, Lynchburg, VA, 24502, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bmsdirectinc.com

BMS Direct is a nationwide service provider of high-quality direct marketing solutions, delivering cost-effective communications to your target market. We offer a one-stop solution for our client’s, from graphic design, mailing services, and printing, to our recent additions such as promotional products, branded apparel, and web to print capabilities. Our mission is to provide solutions that bring value to our customers in order to drive results.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DMP BPO

1601 Wallace Dr, Carrollton, Texas, 75006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dmpbpo.com

DMP BPO is a leading outsourcing and technology company specializing in Omni-Channel production and delivery of customer communications via print/mail and electronic platforms. Our clients choose us because: • DMP is system agnostic which reduces the effort and time of their staff in the initial set up of the partnership with DMP. • DMP’s Automated Document Electronic Production Tracking system (ADEPT) incorporates piece level tracking and reporting of both print and email into our Client Information System (CIS) giving clients the ability monitor the production and distribution of their customer communication real-time. • DMP is committed to the security of their data and is SOC 1 Type 2 compliant in conjunction with CyberGRX, NIST SP 800-53 and CMS assessments. • DMP helps increase the productivity of their staff as a trusted source for both print and electronic communication, data aggregation and document composition, electronic bill presentment and payment, SMS and email notification and direct mail marketing. As a business partner we are also members and contribute to many local and national business organizations of our clients. DMP is a member of WSIA (Wholesale & Specialty Insurance Association), IASA (insurance accounting & systems association), TABATPA (Texas Association of Benefit Administrators), ACA of Texas (American Collectors Association of TX) and AAIPA (African-American Insurance Professionals Association). To investigate if a partnership with DMP BPO can help you avoid risk, and save time and money contact Eric Douglas – eric.douglas@dmpbpo – (972) 446-3671 x104.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bms-direct-inc..jpeg
BMS Direct, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dmp-bpo.jpeg
DMP BPO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BMS Direct, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DMP BPO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BMS Direct, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DMP BPO in 2025.

Incident History — BMS Direct, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BMS Direct, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DMP BPO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DMP BPO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bms-direct-inc..jpeg
BMS Direct, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dmp-bpo.jpeg
DMP BPO
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both BMS Direct, Inc. company and DMP BPO company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, DMP BPO company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BMS Direct, Inc. company.

In the current year, DMP BPO company and BMS Direct, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DMP BPO company nor BMS Direct, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DMP BPO company nor BMS Direct, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DMP BPO company nor BMS Direct, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. company nor DMP BPO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. nor DMP BPO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. company nor DMP BPO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BMS Direct, Inc. company employs more people globally than DMP BPO company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. nor DMP BPO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. nor DMP BPO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. nor DMP BPO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. nor DMP BPO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. nor DMP BPO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. nor DMP BPO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References