Comparison Overview

BMO U.S.

VS

Capitec

BMO U.S.

320 S Canal St, None, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60661
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bmo.com/en-us/main/personal/

We’re a bank, but there’s more to it than that. We're a top ten bank in North America and have been serving our customers since 1817. BMO provides personal and commercial banking, global markets and investment banking services to 13 million customers and clients. And with over 54,000 employees, we take caring for our people seriously.​ When you join BMO, it opens a world of opportunities. This is a team that's committed to helping you succeed – personally and professionally. Because at BMO, when you grow, we grow. ​ You know your worth and so do we. That’s why we offer the right mix of learning programs, on-the-job experiences, and opportunities to build personal and professional connections – so you can build a meaningful career and thrive as a part of a winning culture. ​ Sound like your kind of place? Then we should be co-workers.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,405
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Capitec

5 Neutron Road, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, ZA, 7600
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
http://www.capitecbank.co.za

Imagine simple, affordable banking solutions that work for you – just like it does for over 25 million South Africans. They’re banking smart, paying less and getting more value every day with us. As the country’s leading digital bank, we’re proud to have been voted the Coolest Bank by the youth in the 2024 Sunday Times GenNext Awards. With 880 branches and a team of over 16,900, we’re here to grow with you.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 21,561
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bmo-us.jpeg
BMO U.S.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capitec-bank.jpeg
Capitec
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BMO U.S.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capitec
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BMO U.S. in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capitec in 2026.

Incident History — BMO U.S. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BMO U.S. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capitec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capitec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bmo-us.jpeg
BMO U.S.
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2018
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Error
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capitec-bank.jpeg
Capitec
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Capitec company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BMO U.S. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BMO U.S. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Capitec company has not reported any.

In the current year, Capitec company and BMO U.S. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capitec company nor BMO U.S. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

BMO U.S. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Capitec company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Capitec company nor BMO U.S. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BMO U.S. company nor Capitec company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BMO U.S. nor Capitec holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BMO U.S. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Capitec company.

Capitec company employs more people globally than BMO U.S. company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither BMO U.S. nor Capitec holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BMO U.S. nor Capitec holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BMO U.S. nor Capitec holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BMO U.S. nor Capitec holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BMO U.S. nor Capitec holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BMO U.S. nor Capitec holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References