Comparison Overview

BLW Engineers

VS

Arch Height Index

BLW Engineers

311 Great Rd, Littleton, Massachusetts, 01460, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

BLW Engineers is a consulting engineering firm providing design related services for Mechanical and Electrical building systems. BLW Engineers specializes in feasibility studies, energy conservation evaluations, engineered designs, cost estimating, construction administration and project management. BLW Engineers has extensive experience in the design of Building Systems for various size and types of projects including: Industrial, Office, Educational, Commercial, Medical, Retail, Hotel, Housing, Transportation, Airport, Municipal, Military, and Federal Facilities. Additional experience includes: design build, public bid and select bid engineering. BLW Engineers is committed to providing engineering services of the highest quality, innovative solutions and attention to detail for large projects to the most intricate design plans. Our firm realizes the importance of providing complete and coordinated designs that focus on the particular project requirements and complete client satisfaction; our reputation depends on it.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arch Height Index

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Arch Height Index Measurement System is a simple, comprehensive and proven means to classify the foot and its structure. Employed by research scientists, doctors, the U.S. Army, and many more, the AHI enables precise and repeatable measurements of the foot. The AHIMS reproducibly and reliably provides data that can readily be translated into a robust and meaningful set of values. The Arch Height Index (AHI) is a numerical interpretation of foot type, calculated using six measurements, easily obtained using the AHIMS and a standard scale. By evaluating these measures across two states of weight bearing, the System allows for a dynamic characterization of the medial longitudinal arch which promises to facilitate further correlations to foot mechanics and injury pattern. Additionally, the nature of manufacturing for the AHIMS allows for a limitless number of custom functionalities to be added to the base model.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blw-engineers.jpeg
BLW Engineers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archheightindex.jpeg
Arch Height Index
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BLW Engineers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arch Height Index
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BLW Engineers in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arch Height Index in 2025.

Incident History — BLW Engineers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BLW Engineers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arch Height Index (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arch Height Index cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blw-engineers.jpeg
BLW Engineers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archheightindex.jpeg
Arch Height Index
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arch Height Index company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BLW Engineers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arch Height Index company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BLW Engineers company.

In the current year, Arch Height Index company and BLW Engineers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arch Height Index company nor BLW Engineers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arch Height Index company nor BLW Engineers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arch Height Index company nor BLW Engineers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BLW Engineers company nor Arch Height Index company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BLW Engineers nor Arch Height Index holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BLW Engineers company nor Arch Height Index company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither BLW Engineers nor Arch Height Index holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BLW Engineers nor Arch Height Index holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BLW Engineers nor Arch Height Index holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BLW Engineers nor Arch Height Index holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BLW Engineers nor Arch Height Index holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BLW Engineers nor Arch Height Index holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H