Comparison Overview

Bluefrog

VS

Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation

Bluefrog

2-4 Rufus Street, London, N1 6PE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

About Bluefrog We focus on identifying and meeting donor needs as a means to develop outstanding fundraising strategies and materials. Established in 1997 and staffed with over 30 experienced and creative fundraisers, we look to work with likeminded clients who share our ethos. We are independent and committed to helping our clients achieve their goals. Though recruiting one-off donors can be easy, recruiting loyal donors and building a lasting connection takes time and effort. At Bluefrog a lot of that effort goes into sharing the joy of giving with those privileged enough to help, as that’s how we can bring charities and the public closer together. Attracting donors who are likely to support our clients for the long-term. Our approach relies on aligning the strengths and capabilities of our clients, with what donors want to give to. Offer, technique and a deep rooted understanding of donors come together, to create great fundraising.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 93
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation

PO Box 26666 , Albuquerque, 87125-6666, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Founded in 1968 as one of the first 100 hospital foundations in the country, Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation is dedicated to maximizing support to ensure Presbyterian Healthcare Services continues its long legacy of providing quality, efficient, and affordable care for individuals and families across New Mexico. As a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, 100% of donations support new care programs, technical innovations, advanced education, the purchase of specialized equipment, patient assistance, and capital needs.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bluefrog.jpeg
Bluefrog
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/preshealthfoundation.jpeg
Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bluefrog
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bluefrog in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Bluefrog (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bluefrog cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bluefrog.jpeg
Bluefrog
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/preshealthfoundation.jpeg
Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Phishing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bluefrog company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bluefrog company has not reported any.

In the current year, Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation company and Bluefrog company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation company nor Bluefrog company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Bluefrog company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation company nor Bluefrog company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bluefrog company nor Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bluefrog nor Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bluefrog company.

Neither Bluefrog nor Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bluefrog nor Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bluefrog nor Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bluefrog nor Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bluefrog nor Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bluefrog nor Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N