Comparison Overview

Blue House

VS

Root Studio

Blue House

2168 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20007, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Thanks for checking out Blue House… your go-to partner for creative graphic design, publication management, smart marketing advice and improved sales. Our clients turn to us for: * All aspects of graphic design, from concept development to print, mailing and distribution * Marketing strategy * Advertising, exhibit and sponsorship sales * Stellar websites * An unwavering commitment to our clients’ success! Since 1994, we’ve worked mainly with associations and non-profits across the Washington metropolitan region. We proudly boast that some of our original customers are still using our services today. We want you to know that Blue House is passionate about our craft. We like what we do and look forward to coming to work every day (yes, really!). Maybe that’s why the majority of our team members have stuck with us for more than five years. We’re right where we want to be, with a company culture that fosters personal and professional growth, pride of accomplishment, creativity, and true dedication to success. Blue House continues to be named one of the area’s "Top 25" graphic design companies by the city’s leading business publication, the Washington Business Journal.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Root Studio

Lincoln, Lincolnshire, GB, LN2 1BD
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Root Studio is a graphic and web design agency based in Lincoln & Leicester, UK. We work with businesses large and small to develop a strong brand, a creative marketing campaign and a professional image across both web and print. Check out our website to see examples of our recent work or get in touch to discuss what we can do with your business.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-house.jpeg
Blue House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/root-studio.jpeg
Root Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blue House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Root Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue House in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Root Studio in 2025.

Incident History — Blue House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Root Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Root Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-house.jpeg
Blue House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/root-studio.jpeg
Root Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blue House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Root Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Root Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blue House company.

In the current year, Root Studio company and Blue House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Root Studio company nor Blue House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Root Studio company nor Blue House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Root Studio company nor Blue House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blue House company nor Root Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blue House nor Root Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Blue House company nor Root Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Blue House company employs more people globally than Root Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Blue House nor Root Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blue House nor Root Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blue House nor Root Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blue House nor Root Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blue House nor Root Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blue House nor Root Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X