Comparison Overview

Blue Forest Engineering

VS

Whitelaw Hydraulics

Blue Forest Engineering

3622 Kingsley Street, Oakland, CA, 94610, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Blue Forest Engineering was founded in 2017 by Tyler Bradshaw in Oakland, CA. After more than 20 years of experience in the industry and completing many groundbreaking sustainable projects, he wanted to work within a more “purpose driven” work environment, something different from the “mission driven profit first” model too common in larger engineering firms. For us, that purpose is to make the sustainable building design available to everyone, to every project and make it easy to replicate by others through open dialog and sharing even with our competitors. This is the “Why” of this firm and what motivates us to rise in the morning with energy and enthusiasm to tackle the unique challenges that are inherent in doing something special and worthwhile in our work and life in general. Blue Forest Engineering is unique from other M&P firms in that it seeks solutions to building systems designs that identify and leverage synergistic opportunities between building systems, building envelope and natural site resources. For example, our first task on the HVAC design is work towards reduce the loads first through smart collaboration with the architects early in the project while the envelope & programming elements are still in development and easy to modify. Most systems design approach rely primarily on the application of proven off the shelf components but we consider emerging technologies where it makes sense to do so. We know that simple, low technology approaches and systems are those most likely to work properly not just the first year but more importantly for the life of the building and will require less owner intervention to do so. A paraphrased quote by Albert Einstein best sums our approach, “Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler”.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Whitelaw Hydraulics

252 Governor Rd, Braeside, Victoria, AU, 3195
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Established in 1980 by Robert Whitelaw as an independent supplier to the Australian Fluid Power Industry, Whitelaw Hydraulics offers a vast selection of hydraulic equipment for the Mobile, Agricultural and Mining Industries specialising in superior quality US & European built products. We are the sole Australian distributors for the renowned international brands Permco, Concentric and Lodar & Akon. Comprehensive knowledge of the current market and its history, including the many changes of product ownership and branding over the past 40 plus years, has allowed Whitelaw Hydraulics to identify and supply many brands of hydraulic equipment that are no longer available through original channels. Fully committed to the Mobile, Agricultural and Mining Industries, Whitelaw Hydraulics guarantee to manufacture standard Permco builds within 24 hours and more complex builds within 48 hours of an order. Comprehensive stock levels in both Melbourne and Perth ensure parts are always available to build pumps and motors and supply spare parts and products on a ‘same day service’ basis Australia wide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-forest-engineering.jpeg
Blue Forest Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitelaw-hydraulics.jpeg
Whitelaw Hydraulics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blue Forest Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Whitelaw Hydraulics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Forest Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whitelaw Hydraulics in 2025.

Incident History — Blue Forest Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Forest Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Whitelaw Hydraulics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whitelaw Hydraulics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-forest-engineering.jpeg
Blue Forest Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whitelaw-hydraulics.jpeg
Whitelaw Hydraulics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Blue Forest Engineering company and Whitelaw Hydraulics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Whitelaw Hydraulics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blue Forest Engineering company.

In the current year, Whitelaw Hydraulics company and Blue Forest Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Whitelaw Hydraulics company nor Blue Forest Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Whitelaw Hydraulics company nor Blue Forest Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Whitelaw Hydraulics company nor Blue Forest Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering company nor Whitelaw Hydraulics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering nor Whitelaw Hydraulics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering company nor Whitelaw Hydraulics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Whitelaw Hydraulics company employs more people globally than Blue Forest Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering nor Whitelaw Hydraulics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering nor Whitelaw Hydraulics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering nor Whitelaw Hydraulics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering nor Whitelaw Hydraulics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering nor Whitelaw Hydraulics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blue Forest Engineering nor Whitelaw Hydraulics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H