Comparison Overview

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City

VS

Gallagher

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City

2301 Main Street, Kansas City, MO, 64108, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City (Blue KC) is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and a not-for-profit health insurance provider serving more than one million members in 32 counties in greater Kansas City and northwest Missouri and Johnson and Wyandotte counties in Kansas. Blue KC's mission is to provide affordable access to healthcare and to improve the health of our members. Blue KC was named one of the โ€œBest Companies to Work Forโ€ in 2012 and 2019 in the large company category by Ingramโ€™s Magazine.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 1,308
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gallagher

2850 Golf Road, None, Rolling Meadows, IL, US, 60008
Last Update: 2025-07-23 (UTC)

Excellent

Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running, and enable individuals and families to face their future with confidence. Gallagher provides retail and wholesale property and casualty brokerage, alternative risk transfer services, employee benefit consulting, and actuarial services. Gallagher also offers claims and information management, risk control consulting and appraisal services, human resource consulting, and retirement services. Follow us on social: Instagram: http://instagram.com/gallagherglobal Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/GallagherGlobal Twitter: https://twitter.com/GallagherGlobal YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/GallagherGlobal

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 43,519
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-cross-and-blue-shield-of-kansas-city.jpeg
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagher-global.jpeg
Gallagher
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gallagher
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-cross-and-blue-shield-of-kansas-city.jpeg
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagher-global.jpeg
Gallagher
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company and Gallagher company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Gallagher company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gallagher company and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gallagher company nor Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Gallagher company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gallagher company nor Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company nor Gallagher company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Gallagher company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company.

Gallagher company employs more people globally than Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X