Comparison Overview

Blue Apple Education

VS

Studio 22

Blue Apple Education

Manchester, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

We are communication and design experts for schools. Since 2000, we have produced outstanding websites, prospectuses, video, photography, logos, branding and more for schools based on our belief that each school is unique and 'remarkable'​ in some way. In seeking the 'remarkable'​, we listen, we investigate, we question, we challenge, we think, we digest, we push, we re-think. We understand...then we create.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio 22

21 E. Main St., Thurmont, 21788, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

Strategic Communications for Active Lifestyle Brands We’re experts in creating visual touchpoints, using strategic design planning and infusing our passion for the outdoor life, to help you walk your talk and connect with your target audience. Being focused specifically on the outdoor, bike and snowsports markets – with a creative team that also understands how to navigate the retail landscape – informs the work we do to put your best face forward, whether through merchandise presentation, with brand development or via sales literature.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-apple-education.jpeg
Blue Apple Education
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-22.jpeg
Studio 22
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blue Apple Education
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio 22
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Apple Education in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio 22 in 2025.

Incident History — Blue Apple Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Apple Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio 22 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio 22 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-apple-education.jpeg
Blue Apple Education
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-22.jpeg
Studio 22
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studio 22 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Blue Apple Education company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio 22 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blue Apple Education company.

In the current year, Studio 22 company and Blue Apple Education company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio 22 company nor Blue Apple Education company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio 22 company nor Blue Apple Education company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio 22 company nor Blue Apple Education company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blue Apple Education company nor Studio 22 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blue Apple Education nor Studio 22 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Blue Apple Education company nor Studio 22 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Blue Apple Education company and Studio 22 company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Blue Apple Education nor Studio 22 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blue Apple Education nor Studio 22 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blue Apple Education nor Studio 22 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blue Apple Education nor Studio 22 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blue Apple Education nor Studio 22 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blue Apple Education nor Studio 22 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X