Comparison Overview

Blooms Printing and Design

VS

Topflight Corporation

Blooms Printing and Design

4792 N 4th St Ext SE, Dennison, 44621, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14

PH 740-922-1765 | www.bloomsprinting.com Full Service Printing and Design Services. We are a family business committed to serving others. In the early 80's, Rick Bloom Sr. started printing as a hobby in the basement of his home to make some extra money. In 1987, Bloom's Printing officially opened its doors in Dennison, Ohio. Today, after several expansions, it is a full-service, family owned and operated business that continues to help businesses and individuals with their printing and design needs. Our cutting edge technology and streamlined business process allows us to provide a quality product in a timely manner, while reducing cost.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Topflight Corporation

277 Commerce Drive, Glen Rock, PA, 17327, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Topflight Corporation is a contract manufacturer of die-cut components, pressure sensitive labels, printed conductive parts, and shrink sleeves. We are ISO 9001:2015 & ISO 13485:2008 certified, with customers in the primary market groups of medical devices, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics & personal care, consumer goods, tire & automotive, and electronics. Converting technologies include precision, tight registration die-cutting; multi-layer laminations; hot stamping; and rotary, flat-bed, and laser die cutting. Rapid prototyping services are available to ensure scalability from design to full scale production. Other Specialties: conductive printing (screen or flexo with PTF, etching, or nano-particle inks); UDI (Unique Device Identification) labels, brand security labels (taggants, holograms, tamper evident); RFID converting.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 123
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blooms-printing.jpeg
Blooms Printing and Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topflight-corporation.jpeg
Topflight Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blooms Printing and Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Topflight Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blooms Printing and Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Topflight Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Blooms Printing and Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blooms Printing and Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Topflight Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Topflight Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blooms-printing.jpeg
Blooms Printing and Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topflight-corporation.jpeg
Topflight Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blooms Printing and Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Topflight Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Topflight Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blooms Printing and Design company.

In the current year, Topflight Corporation company and Blooms Printing and Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Topflight Corporation company nor Blooms Printing and Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Topflight Corporation company nor Blooms Printing and Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Topflight Corporation company nor Blooms Printing and Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design company nor Topflight Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design nor Topflight Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design company nor Topflight Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Topflight Corporation company employs more people globally than Blooms Printing and Design company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design nor Topflight Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design nor Topflight Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design nor Topflight Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design nor Topflight Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design nor Topflight Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blooms Printing and Design nor Topflight Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L