Comparison Overview

BloodHorse

VS

Murdoch Books

BloodHorse

821 Corporate Dr, Lexington, 40503, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

BloodHorse, the leading provider of information and news for the Thoroughbred industry, is a multimedia publishing company that traces its roots to 1916. BloodHorse has a dynamic cross-platform offering with a wide range of products including the BloodHorse weekly magazine, an industry leading website at Bloodhorse.com, and the BloodHorse Daily email and app, which provides analysis and news focusing on industry professionals. BloodHorse also publishes a range of other respected Thoroughbred industry focused publications.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Murdoch Books

83 Alexander Street, Crows Nest, 2037, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Murdoch Books is a division of Allen & Unwin, Australia’s largest independent book publisher. Originally established by Murdoch Magazines in the early 1990s, Murdoch Books was acquired by Allen & Unwin in 2012 in a perfect match of independent spirit and industry-leading flair and expertise in lifestyle publishing. We publish books for ‘living life well’ across a broad range of categories, encompassing food, health and wellbeing, personal transformation and self-help, home and family, and sustainable living. Headquartered in Sydney, Australia, we have offices in Auckland and London and an extensive network of international partners across more than 20 languages.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloodhorse.jpeg
BloodHorse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/murdoch-books.jpeg
Murdoch Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BloodHorse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Murdoch Books
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BloodHorse in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Murdoch Books in 2025.

Incident History — BloodHorse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BloodHorse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Murdoch Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Murdoch Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloodhorse.jpeg
BloodHorse
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/murdoch-books.jpeg
Murdoch Books
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Murdoch Books company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BloodHorse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Murdoch Books company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BloodHorse company.

In the current year, Murdoch Books company and BloodHorse company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Murdoch Books company nor BloodHorse company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Murdoch Books company nor BloodHorse company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Murdoch Books company nor BloodHorse company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BloodHorse company nor Murdoch Books company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BloodHorse nor Murdoch Books holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BloodHorse company nor Murdoch Books company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BloodHorse company employs more people globally than Murdoch Books company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither BloodHorse nor Murdoch Books holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BloodHorse nor Murdoch Books holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BloodHorse nor Murdoch Books holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BloodHorse nor Murdoch Books holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BloodHorse nor Murdoch Books holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BloodHorse nor Murdoch Books holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.