Comparison Overview

Blitzprint

VS

Display Systems Australia

Blitzprint

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Blitzprint Inc provides a wide range of affordable publishing, editing, distribution, and print services for publishers and independent authors. Our mission is to equip authors with the right combination of services, know-how, expert support, and continuous guidance required to level the playing field with their traditionally published counterparts, so that they can succeed in the highly competitive book marketplace. Blitzprint also serves the commercial print market. We incorporate Web2Print procurement technology in companies ranging from 10 employees to 6000 employees.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Display Systems Australia

Unit 19, Discovery Cove Industrial Estate, Banksmeadow, NSW, 2019, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Display Systems Australia is an Australian owned company that has been designing, manufacturing, selling and exporting portable display systems since 1988 whilst providing an in-house printing service. We manufacture a wide range of products, most notably the BannerBug brand banner stand which is well known worldwide. Raise your business profile and stand apart from the already crowded market place with DSA exhibition display solutions.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Blitzprint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/display-systems-australia.jpeg
Display Systems Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blitzprint
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Display Systems Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blitzprint in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Display Systems Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Blitzprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blitzprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Display Systems Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Display Systems Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Blitzprint
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/display-systems-australia.jpeg
Display Systems Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blitzprint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Display Systems Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Display Systems Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blitzprint company.

In the current year, Display Systems Australia company and Blitzprint company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Display Systems Australia company nor Blitzprint company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Display Systems Australia company nor Blitzprint company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Display Systems Australia company nor Blitzprint company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blitzprint company nor Display Systems Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blitzprint nor Display Systems Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Blitzprint company nor Display Systems Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Blitzprint company employs more people globally than Display Systems Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Blitzprint nor Display Systems Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blitzprint nor Display Systems Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blitzprint nor Display Systems Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blitzprint nor Display Systems Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blitzprint nor Display Systems Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blitzprint nor Display Systems Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N