Comparison Overview

BlindSpot Think Tank

VS

New Buildings Institute

BlindSpot Think Tank

PO Box 140, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 9DS, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

BlindSpot is a small think tank providing big ideas for global problems. We provide system change research, talks, training and advice for business, government and NGOs internationally. Our ‘blindspotting’ approach reveals and maps possibilities that can be hard to see due to the complexity of today’s problems. Our Planet Levers workshop is a powerful antidote to the ailing ambition of incremental and reductionist habits. New collaborations are warmly invited with our world-leading projects or yours – please get in touch. Radical system change. Our policy options for fast planet-scale system change were published by NATO as advanced research on global security. James Greyson is Founder and Head of BlindSpot Think Tank. http://uk.linkedin.com/in/jamesgreyson/

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New Buildings Institute

151 SW 1st Ave, Suite 300, Portland, Oregon, US, 97204
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

New Buildings Institute (NBI) is a nonprofit organization working to improve the energy performance of commercial buildings. We work collaboratively with commercial building market players—governments, utilities, energy efficiency advocates and building professionals—to remove barriers to energy efficiency, including promoting advanced design practices, improved technologies, public policies and programs that improve energy efficiency. We also develop and offer guidance to individuals and organizations on designing and constructing energy-efficient buildings through our suite of tools and resources.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blindspot-global-revival-think-tank.jpeg
BlindSpot Think Tank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-buildings-institute.jpeg
New Buildings Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BlindSpot Think Tank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Buildings Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BlindSpot Think Tank in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Buildings Institute in 2025.

Incident History — BlindSpot Think Tank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BlindSpot Think Tank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Buildings Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Buildings Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blindspot-global-revival-think-tank.jpeg
BlindSpot Think Tank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-buildings-institute.jpeg
New Buildings Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

New Buildings Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BlindSpot Think Tank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, New Buildings Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BlindSpot Think Tank company.

In the current year, New Buildings Institute company and BlindSpot Think Tank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Buildings Institute company nor BlindSpot Think Tank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Buildings Institute company nor BlindSpot Think Tank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Buildings Institute company nor BlindSpot Think Tank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank company nor New Buildings Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank nor New Buildings Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank company nor New Buildings Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New Buildings Institute company employs more people globally than BlindSpot Think Tank company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank nor New Buildings Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank nor New Buildings Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank nor New Buildings Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank nor New Buildings Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank nor New Buildings Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BlindSpot Think Tank nor New Buildings Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X