Comparison Overview

BLC Attorneys

VS

CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators

BLC Attorneys

4 Cape Road, Port Elizabeth, 6001, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

With its primary office located in Port Elizabeth and a branch in East London, the directors and staff of BLC Attorneys are committed to making a meaningful contribution to the economic and social development of the Eastern Cape Province and consequently, South Africa. We are committed to investing in legal and business technologies that will further enhance the quality of the legal services for which we are known and we strive to identify and explore promising opportunities and new practice areas to enable us to adapt to the ever-changing environment and the evolving needs of our clients. Our collaborative approach promotes our relationships with our clients and enables us to become our clients’ preferred legal advisors. Our team is tasked with delivering our services in a tech-savvy manner tailored to the needs of our clients. At BLC we value the reputation we have earned as hardworking, original and principled lawyers and we pledge to continue to defend the highest ethical codes. To this end, we are dedicated to attracting and cultivating a diverse and well-rounded team of legal practitioners, who share our values and aspirations.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators

50 Corporate Park, None, Irvine, CA, US, 92606
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

CPT Group, Inc. is a premier provider of notice and settlement class action administration services, trusted by major courts since 1984. With a track record of administering over 7,000 cases, servicing 250 million+ class members, and disbursing billions in settlement funds, CPT offers comprehensive solutions for all stages of class action administration. From pre-certification to final distribution, CPT's in-house team in Irvine, California deliver expert project management, data handling, legal noticing, and fiduciary services with a commitment to quality, security, and neutrality.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blc-attorneys.jpeg
BLC Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cpt-group.jpeg
CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BLC Attorneys
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BLC Attorneys in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators in 2025.

Incident History — BLC Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BLC Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blc-attorneys.jpeg
BLC Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cpt-group.jpeg
CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

BLC Attorneys company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BLC Attorneys company has not reported any.

In the current year, CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company and BLC Attorneys company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company nor BLC Attorneys company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company has disclosed at least one data breach, while BLC Attorneys company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company nor BLC Attorneys company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BLC Attorneys company nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BLC Attorneys nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BLC Attorneys company nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators company employs more people globally than BLC Attorneys company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither BLC Attorneys nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BLC Attorneys nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BLC Attorneys nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BLC Attorneys nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BLC Attorneys nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BLC Attorneys nor CPT Group, Inc. Class Action Administrators holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X