Comparison Overview

Blas de Lezo

VS

Anderson & Shah

Blas de Lezo

Avinguda dels Ports d'Europa, 100, Barcelona, Spain, ES, 08040
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Blas de Lezo Abogados ofrece una solución adecuada a las necesidades de su negocio. Apuntamos a la excelencia de los servicios jurídicos desde una vertiente comercial, amoldando nuestros servicios a sus necesidades diarias y asesorándole a iniciativa propia para evitarle conflictos futuros. Nuestra especialidad dentro del derecho marítimo y del derecho y economía del medioambiente y la sostenibilidad se remonta a los inicios de la actividad de nuestro despacho. Desde entonces hemos visto multitud de cambios en la industria marítima y hemos compartido grandes experiencias con nuestros clientes. A día de hoy, continuamos con nuestro afán emprendedor de sugerirles nuevas formas de trabajo y gestión, haciéndonos cómplices de su propio desarrollo y éxito profesional.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 120
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Anderson & Shah

undefined, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08002, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Anderson Shah is a litigation and trial boutique with a singular goal: delivering successful results for our clients in the courtroom. We don’t handle real estate closings or mergers and acquisitions. Instead, every resource we have is devoted to ensuring our clients receive nothing but the highest caliber of representation during the litigation lifecycle. From the initial consultation to pre-trial discovery to trial and through appeal, our Firm’s laser-focus on winning is evident.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blasdelezo.jpeg
Blas de Lezo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anderson-shah.jpeg
Anderson & Shah
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blas de Lezo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Anderson & Shah
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blas de Lezo in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anderson & Shah in 2025.

Incident History — Blas de Lezo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blas de Lezo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Anderson & Shah (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anderson & Shah cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blasdelezo.jpeg
Blas de Lezo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anderson-shah.jpeg
Anderson & Shah
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Anderson & Shah company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Blas de Lezo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Anderson & Shah company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blas de Lezo company.

In the current year, Anderson & Shah company and Blas de Lezo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Anderson & Shah company nor Blas de Lezo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Anderson & Shah company nor Blas de Lezo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Anderson & Shah company nor Blas de Lezo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blas de Lezo company nor Anderson & Shah company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blas de Lezo nor Anderson & Shah holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Blas de Lezo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Anderson & Shah company.

Blas de Lezo company employs more people globally than Anderson & Shah company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Blas de Lezo nor Anderson & Shah holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blas de Lezo nor Anderson & Shah holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blas de Lezo nor Anderson & Shah holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blas de Lezo nor Anderson & Shah holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blas de Lezo nor Anderson & Shah holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blas de Lezo nor Anderson & Shah holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X