Comparison Overview

Impression Label

VS

Flower City Group

Impression Label

111 Inverness Dr E, Englewood, Colorado, 80112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Formerly Blair Labeling, Impression Label was created to emphasize the evolution and expansion of one of the industry-leading label printing companies. Impression Label is a full-service, pressure-sensitive label printing company that creates premium labels. We have been around for more than three decades, high standards for our equipment lines, and over 350 years of combined label printing experience. Our dedicated, enthusiastic team, is ready to help create your branding identity! Impression Label provides our clients with the best service, fast response and finish times, reliability, and most of all, the highest quality product label printing solutions. Impression Label manufactures and sells pressure-sensitive multicolored, prime, promotional, and industrial labels. We also have the capacity to print: decals, tamper evident constructions, thermals, patterns, tags, hangers, and card products. Adhesives for both hand and high-speed automatic applications are available for various temperatures, durability, and bonding needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Flower City Group

1725 Mt. Read Blvd, Rochester, NY, 14606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Starting in 1970 in Rochester, NY (AKA the "Flower City), the Flower City Group is your concept-to-delivery ally for retail signage, point-of-purchase displays, and packaging that elevates your brand to transcend the shelf. In an ever-changing retail landscape, brands must rise above competitors on the physical shelf while engaging customers in new, complementary ways. It takes strategic and creative agility backed by serious production prowess. It takes Flower City Group.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 254
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blair-labeling-inc-.jpeg
Impression Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flower-city-printing.jpeg
Flower City Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Impression Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Flower City Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impression Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flower City Group in 2025.

Incident History — Impression Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impression Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Flower City Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flower City Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blair-labeling-inc-.jpeg
Impression Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flower-city-printing.jpeg
Flower City Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Flower City Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Impression Label company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Flower City Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Impression Label company.

In the current year, Flower City Group company and Impression Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Flower City Group company nor Impression Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Flower City Group company nor Impression Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Flower City Group company nor Impression Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Impression Label company nor Flower City Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Impression Label nor Flower City Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Impression Label company nor Flower City Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Flower City Group company employs more people globally than Impression Label company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Impression Label nor Flower City Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Impression Label nor Flower City Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Impression Label nor Flower City Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Impression Label nor Flower City Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Impression Label nor Flower City Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Impression Label nor Flower City Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N