Comparison Overview

Blacklite Graphics

VS

63 Visual

Blacklite Graphics

undefined, Columbus, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Why opt for professional graphic design, you ask? While folks are quick to grasp the perils of navigating legal or tax matters solo, not everyone realizes the risks lurking in the DIY graphic design realm. Picture this: poor first impressions, missed opportunities, and profits slipping through your fingers. Enter the superhero – the professional graphic designer, swooping in to ensure your marketing materials not only shine but also boost your bottom line. Meet Blacklite Graphics, your go-to graphic design savior. Whether it's advertising, brochure wizardry, corporate identity magic, posters that pop, presentations that wow, or anything that can be printed, Blacklite Graphics guarantees a 100% happiness quotient with the results. To craft an exceptional design solution, they ensure you're not just along for the ride but have a front-row seat, fully understanding the graphic design process. Because when it comes to graphics, why settle for DIY when you can have a pro deliver designs that dazzle?

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

63 Visual

130 5th Ave N, Jacksonville Beach, FL, 32250, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

63 Visual is a graphic design studio in Jacksonville, FL specializing in brand development and web design with an emphasis on typography and illustration. With a background of advertising agency art direction and years of experience in the Jacksonville marketplace, an attention to detail and a fanatical passion for design are always maintained. 63 Visual remains active in the business community by continuing design education, organizing business related events and supporting progress in design thinking while striving to enhance the creative culture in North Florida through leadership with AIGA Jacksonville.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blacklite-graphics.jpeg
Blacklite Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick-carter-design.jpeg
63 Visual
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blacklite Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
63 Visual
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blacklite Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 63 Visual in 2025.

Incident History — Blacklite Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blacklite Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 63 Visual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

63 Visual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blacklite-graphics.jpeg
Blacklite Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick-carter-design.jpeg
63 Visual
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blacklite Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 63 Visual company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 63 Visual company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blacklite Graphics company.

In the current year, 63 Visual company and Blacklite Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 63 Visual company nor Blacklite Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 63 Visual company nor Blacklite Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 63 Visual company nor Blacklite Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blacklite Graphics company nor 63 Visual company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blacklite Graphics nor 63 Visual holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Blacklite Graphics company nor 63 Visual company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

63 Visual company employs more people globally than Blacklite Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Blacklite Graphics nor 63 Visual holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blacklite Graphics nor 63 Visual holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blacklite Graphics nor 63 Visual holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blacklite Graphics nor 63 Visual holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blacklite Graphics nor 63 Visual holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blacklite Graphics nor 63 Visual holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X