Comparison Overview

Blackhall Engineering Limited

VS

Walker Engineering

Blackhall Engineering Limited

Bradford Road, Brighouse, undefined, HD6 4DJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Blackhall our aim is to combine our extraordinary heritage with tailored innovation providing valve solutions for our clients all over the world. Our valvologists build long term relationships through trust and professionalism, manufacturing valves that provide ultimate longevity for any fluid, any temperature and any pressure. The Blackhall vision is to provide our customers with the "Ultimate Valve Experience"​. Whether it is your first point of contact with our sales team, a technical query for our Design Team, or one of our engineers is on-site servicing a valve that we supplied 50 years ago, our aim is to provide exceptional customer service and ultimately give our customer an experience that is highly professional and at the same time enjoyable. Explore more at www.blackhall.co.uk

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Walker Engineering

Units 27-31 Pit Hey Place, Pimbo, Skelmersdale, Lancashire, GB, WN8 9PS
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

We provide the best proactive and reactive full package engineering services. Based in Skelmersdale and established in 1999, Walker Engineering (NW) Ltd is approved for the design, installation, maintenance servicing and fabrication work for mechanical and electrical services. Our team of experts are passionate about delivering our comprehensive projects on time and on budget.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blackhall-eng--ltd.jpeg
Blackhall Engineering Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker-engineering.jpeg
Walker Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blackhall Engineering Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Walker Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blackhall Engineering Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walker Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Blackhall Engineering Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blackhall Engineering Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Walker Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walker Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blackhall-eng--ltd.jpeg
Blackhall Engineering Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker-engineering.jpeg
Walker Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Blackhall Engineering Limited company and Walker Engineering company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Walker Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blackhall Engineering Limited company.

In the current year, Walker Engineering company and Blackhall Engineering Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Walker Engineering company nor Blackhall Engineering Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Walker Engineering company nor Blackhall Engineering Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Walker Engineering company nor Blackhall Engineering Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited company nor Walker Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited nor Walker Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited company nor Walker Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Blackhall Engineering Limited company employs more people globally than Walker Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited nor Walker Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited nor Walker Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited nor Walker Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited nor Walker Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited nor Walker Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blackhall Engineering Limited nor Walker Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H