Comparison Overview

Blackdog Digital

VS

The Watermark Group

Blackdog Digital

Charles House Lower Road, Great Amwell, Ware, SG1 2 9TA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.blackdogdigitalprint.com

Blackdog Digital are a creative print and production company based in London. We create and produce impactful market leading solutions on our added value service, quality and sustainability to pretty much any organisation within any industry. Under the most demanding lead-times we always succeed in what others would deem "impossible"​. We love what we do and are passionate about what we do and who we do it for. That has been at the core of our business from the beginning. Our 24/7 service offering include:- • Digital & Printing • Creative Design & Digital • Brand Development • Large Format Printing • Bid Submissions & Tenders • Award Submissions • Mailing, Fulfilment & Distribution • Print & Design Portals • Video & CGI • Website Design & Development • Promotional Merchandise

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Watermark Group

4271 Gate Crest, San Antonio, TX, 78217, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thewatermarkgroup.com

We cater to the needs of innovative companies that require excellent quality and service for their printing and mailing solutions. From tactical marketing to brand continuity, our clients trust us to efficiently manage their brand and corporate printing needs. Recognized as highly affordable and functional representatives of their company, clients relish the time we return to their workday and budgetary savings. As innovators we continually research new printing methods and technologies to benefit our clients and their brands. Cohesive teams of experts are the foundation of our many long lasting relationships as a preferred business partner. Working with you, your internal design team or external agency, we provide the resources and innovation to help you achieve your business goals.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blackdog-digital.jpeg
Blackdog Digital
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-watermark-group.jpeg
The Watermark Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blackdog Digital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Watermark Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blackdog Digital in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Watermark Group in 2025.

Incident History — Blackdog Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blackdog Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Watermark Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Watermark Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blackdog-digital.jpeg
Blackdog Digital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-watermark-group.jpeg
The Watermark Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blackdog Digital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Watermark Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Watermark Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Blackdog Digital company.

In the current year, The Watermark Group company and Blackdog Digital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Watermark Group company nor Blackdog Digital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Watermark Group company nor Blackdog Digital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Watermark Group company nor Blackdog Digital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Blackdog Digital company nor The Watermark Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blackdog Digital nor The Watermark Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Watermark Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Blackdog Digital company.

The Watermark Group company employs more people globally than Blackdog Digital company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Blackdog Digital nor The Watermark Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blackdog Digital nor The Watermark Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blackdog Digital nor The Watermark Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blackdog Digital nor The Watermark Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blackdog Digital nor The Watermark Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blackdog Digital nor The Watermark Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References