Comparison Overview

Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS

VS

Lois Law Firm

Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS

Ferjemannsveien 10, Trondheim, 7042, NO
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma ble stiftet i 1870 og har hovedkontor i Trondheim. Vi har også kontorer i Namsos, Stadsbygd og på Frøya. Vi bistår næringslivet, det offentlige og privatpersoner. De siste fem årene har det vært en betydelig vekst i firmaet. Vi er i dag 35 ansatte og det 6. største advokatfirmaet utenfor Oslo. Les mer om oss på vår hjemmeside.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lois Law Firm

66 State Route 17N, Suite 200, Paramus, NJ, US, 07652
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to defend employers and carriers in workers’ compensation claims in New York and New Jersey. We partner with clients to learn about their business risk and deliver a tailored, cost-effective defense. Our attorneys are laser-focused on litigating and closing cases by offering a comprehensive cradle-to-grave approach. We aggressively pursue early settlement through timely denials, vigorous and action-oriented defense tactics, and frequent exposure updates so you are positioned to close claims quickly.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bjerkan-stav-advokatfirma-as.jpeg
Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lois-law-firm.jpeg
Lois Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lois Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lois Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lois Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lois Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bjerkan-stav-advokatfirma-as.jpeg
Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lois-law-firm.jpeg
Lois Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company and Lois Law Firm company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lois Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company.

In the current year, Lois Law Firm company and Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lois Law Firm company nor Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lois Law Firm company nor Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lois Law Firm company nor Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company nor Lois Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS nor Lois Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company nor Lois Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lois Law Firm company employs more people globally than Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS nor Lois Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS nor Lois Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS nor Lois Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS nor Lois Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS nor Lois Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bjerkan Stav Advokatfirma AS nor Lois Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X