Comparison Overview

Bitpro

VS

SMS Tech Solutions, LLC

Bitpro

10 Technology Dr, Unit 3, East Setauket, New York, US, 11733
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bitpro buys GPU data centers & mining farms. Fast, Secure, Fair-market offers. Easy, convenient process. Any condition welcomed. As professional GPU miners, we value your GPU mining hardware! We buy more than GPUs – if it’s used for GPU mining we will include it in your offer. We pay, disassemble, pack, and pick-up at your location. - Our fast & efficient process helps you get cash in your hand quickly. - We offer you a fair, competitive price – not based on crypto market volatility. - We keep our margins slim by operating smart and lean – we only win when you’re happy with your offer.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SMS Tech Solutions, LLC

4900 O'Hear Ave, North Charleston, South Carolina, 29405, US
Last Update:

SMS Tech Solutions provides technology solutions for public and private k-12 schools, community colleges and universities, non-profits organizations, small businesses, and state and local government. Our team brings decades of experience in this industry. If you're looking for a level of customer service above the rest, product knowledge and competitive pricing, please contact us. We partner as a value added reseller with Microsoft, Adobe, Symantec, Kaspersky, Sophos, Trend Micro, McAfee, VMware, Veeam, TechSmith, Parallels, Quark, LiveScribe, Nuance, Corel and more. If you are deploying Chromebooks, iPads, Tablets, Laptops.... we have charging and syncing solutions for them all. Check our website www.smstechsolutions.com to find out what's happening at the NEW.... SMS Tech Solutions

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bitproit.jpeg
Bitpro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sms-tech-solutions.jpeg
SMS Tech Solutions, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bitpro
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SMS Tech Solutions, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bitpro in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SMS Tech Solutions, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Bitpro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bitpro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SMS Tech Solutions, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SMS Tech Solutions, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bitproit.jpeg
Bitpro
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sms-tech-solutions.jpeg
SMS Tech Solutions, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bitpro company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bitpro company.

In the current year, SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company and Bitpro company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company nor Bitpro company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company nor Bitpro company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company nor Bitpro company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bitpro company nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bitpro nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bitpro company nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SMS Tech Solutions, LLC company employs more people globally than Bitpro company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Bitpro nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bitpro nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bitpro nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bitpro nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bitpro nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bitpro nor SMS Tech Solutions, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H