Comparison Overview

Bitpro

VS

Elo Touch Solutions

Bitpro

10 Technology Dr, Unit 3, East Setauket, New York, US, 11733
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bitpro buys GPU data centers & mining farms. Fast, Secure, Fair-market offers. Easy, convenient process. Any condition welcomed. As professional GPU miners, we value your GPU mining hardware! We buy more than GPUs – if it’s used for GPU mining we will include it in your offer. We pay, disassemble, pack, and pick-up at your location. - Our fast & efficient process helps you get cash in your hand quickly. - We offer you a fair, competitive price – not based on crypto market volatility. - We keep our margins slim by operating smart and lean – we only win when you’re happy with your offer.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Elo Touch Solutions

2439 Bertelkamp Lane, None, Knoxville, TN, US, 37931
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Elo is a global leader in touchscreen solutions, including modern point of sale systems and interactive digital signage, sized 7 to 65 inches. The pioneer of the touchscreen, Elo now has 30+ million retail and hospitality installations in 80+ countries with products designed in California and built to last with a three-year standard warranty. The Elo touchscreen experience has consistently stood for quality, reliability and innovation. The Elo portfolio encompasses the broadest selection of OEM touch screen components, touch monitors, and all-in-one touch computers for the demanding requirements of diverse markets, including gaming machines, hospitality systems, industrial automation, interactive kiosks, healthcare, office equipment, point of sale terminals, retail displays, and transportation applications. For more information on Elo products and services, please call 800-ELO-TOUCH, email [email protected] or visit us on the web at EloTouch.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bitproit.jpeg
Bitpro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elotouch.jpeg
Elo Touch Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bitpro
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Elo Touch Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bitpro in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elo Touch Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Bitpro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bitpro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Elo Touch Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elo Touch Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bitproit.jpeg
Bitpro
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elotouch.jpeg
Elo Touch Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Elo Touch Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bitpro company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Elo Touch Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bitpro company.

In the current year, Elo Touch Solutions company and Bitpro company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Elo Touch Solutions company nor Bitpro company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Elo Touch Solutions company nor Bitpro company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Elo Touch Solutions company nor Bitpro company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bitpro company nor Elo Touch Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bitpro nor Elo Touch Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bitpro company nor Elo Touch Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bitpro company employs more people globally than Elo Touch Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Bitpro nor Elo Touch Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bitpro nor Elo Touch Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bitpro nor Elo Touch Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bitpro nor Elo Touch Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bitpro nor Elo Touch Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bitpro nor Elo Touch Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H