Comparison Overview

Bisley Furniture

VS

Paul Brayton Designs

Bisley Furniture

Caswell Way, Newport, Wales, NP19 4PW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.thebisleygroup.com

Bisley is a design and manufacturing powerhouse. For over ninety years we’ve been quietly creating innovative products that meet the evolving needs of our working world. Today, Bisley combines this spirit of innovation with a collective knowledge that can only come from experience. We’re unashamedly passionate about storage – it’s at the heart of everything we do. bisley.com

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Paul Brayton Designs

PO Box 7486, High Point, NC 27264, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.paulbraytondesigns.com

Since 1993, Paul Brayton Designs has created an industry brand that designers trust to provide top quality textiles and furniture. -Lounge, guest seating, executive seating, collaborative and occasional tables. -Leather, faux leather and woven upholstery fabrics Each design is handcrafted for the interior designer and their clients using high quality materials and construction techniques.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bisley-office-furniture.jpeg
Bisley Furniture
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paul-brayton-designs.jpeg
Paul Brayton Designs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bisley Furniture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Paul Brayton Designs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bisley Furniture in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paul Brayton Designs in 2025.

Incident History — Bisley Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bisley Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Paul Brayton Designs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paul Brayton Designs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bisley-office-furniture.jpeg
Bisley Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paul-brayton-designs.jpeg
Paul Brayton Designs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bisley Furniture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Paul Brayton Designs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Paul Brayton Designs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bisley Furniture company.

In the current year, Paul Brayton Designs company and Bisley Furniture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Paul Brayton Designs company nor Bisley Furniture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Paul Brayton Designs company nor Bisley Furniture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Paul Brayton Designs company nor Bisley Furniture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bisley Furniture company nor Paul Brayton Designs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bisley Furniture nor Paul Brayton Designs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bisley Furniture company nor Paul Brayton Designs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bisley Furniture company employs more people globally than Paul Brayton Designs company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Bisley Furniture nor Paul Brayton Designs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bisley Furniture nor Paul Brayton Designs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bisley Furniture nor Paul Brayton Designs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bisley Furniture nor Paul Brayton Designs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bisley Furniture nor Paul Brayton Designs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bisley Furniture nor Paul Brayton Designs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References