Comparison Overview

Bishop Museum

VS

The Israel Museum, Jerusalem

Bishop Museum

1525 Bernice St, None, Honolulu, Hawaii, US, 96817
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Bishop Museum is the premier place to experience the history, arts and culture of the Hawaiian people. We are recognized throughout the world for our scientific research, educational programs, and extensive collections which give voice to the stories of Hawai'i and the broader Pacific. Open daily, 9am to 5pm. Closed Thanksgiving day and Christmas day.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 144
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Israel Museum, Jerusalem

Derech Ruppin 11, Jerusalem, 9171002, IL
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Israel Museum, Jerusalem, is Israel’s foremost cultural institution and one of the world’s leading encyclopaedic museums. Founded in 1965, the Museum’s terraced 20-acre campus houses a wide-ranging collection of art and archaeology of world-class status. Its holdings include the world’s most comprehensive collections of the archaeology of the Holy Land, and Jewish Art and Life, as well as significant and extensive holdings in the Fine Arts, the latter encompassing eleven separate departments: Israeli Art; European Art; Modern Art; Contemporary Art; Prints and Drawings; Photography; Design and Architecture; Asian Art; African Art; Oceanic Art; and Arts of the Americas. The campus also includes the Shrine of the Book, which houses the 2,000-year-old Dead Sea Scrolls, the world’s oldest biblical manuscripts; an extensive model of Jerusalem in the Second Temple Period; the Billy Rose Art Garden; and a dynamic Youth Wing for Art Education which provides educational programs for all ages, including more than 100,000 children every year. In just over fifty years, the Museum has built a far-ranging collection of nearly 500,000 objects through an unparalleled legacy of gifts and support from a wide circle of friends and patrons throughout the world. The Museum also embraces a dynamic program of some 20–25 new exhibitions a year, and a rich annual program of publications, educational activities, and special cultural events which reach out to every sector of the population.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 234
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bishop-museum.jpeg
Bishop Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-israel-museum-jerusalem.jpeg
The Israel Museum, Jerusalem
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bishop Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Israel Museum, Jerusalem
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bishop Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Israel Museum, Jerusalem in 2026.

Incident History — Bishop Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bishop Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Israel Museum, Jerusalem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Israel Museum, Jerusalem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bishop-museum.jpeg
Bishop Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-israel-museum-jerusalem.jpeg
The Israel Museum, Jerusalem
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bishop Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bishop Museum company.

In the current year, The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company and Bishop Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company nor Bishop Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company nor Bishop Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company nor Bishop Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bishop Museum company nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bishop Museum nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bishop Museum company nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Israel Museum, Jerusalem company employs more people globally than Bishop Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Bishop Museum nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bishop Museum nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bishop Museum nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bishop Museum nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bishop Museum nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bishop Museum nor The Israel Museum, Jerusalem holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H