Comparison Overview

Birmingham Museums Trust

VS

The Mint Museum

Birmingham Museums Trust

Birmingham Museum & Art Gallery, Birmingham, B3 3DH, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-18

We are Birmingham Museums Trust, the largest independent museum trust in the UK, responsible for managing the museum sites and collections owned by Birmingham City Council. With an encyclopaedic collection of over one million objects and specimens covering art, human history, science and industry, and natural science, our mission is to bring Birmingham out by shining new light on people’s stories, collections and creativity. Between April 2024 – March 2025, we welcomed over 475000 visitors to Birmingham Museum & Art Gallery, Thinktank Birmingham Science Museum, Aston Hall, Blakesley Hall, Museum of the Jewellery Quarter, Sarehole Mill, Soho House, the Museum Collection Centre and Weoley Castle. If you would like to find out more about our latest vacancies, venue hire opportunities or upcoming events, visit our website for more information and contact details. Birmingham Museums Trust is a limited company (Company No: 07737797) and a registered charity (Charity No: 1147014).

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 177
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Mint Museum

2730 Randolph Rd, Charlotte, NC, 28207, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Beyond the walls that display the art, that separate the collections, that house the lights and descriptions. Beyond the walls between the artist’s intentions and the visitor’s interpretations, between what you see and how you feel, between what was shared and what you’ll share with others. Beyond the walls you’ll find The Mint Museum. An internationally-renowned institution, The Mint Museum is dedicated to collecting, conserving, exhibiting, inspiring, publishing and protecting important works of art and design from all over the global art community. Our commitment to integrity, leadership and innovation intends to encourage not only the understanding of diverse peoples and cultures, but respect for the impact and influence they’ve had on each and every one of us. Through our two locations, Mint Museum Uptown and Mint Museum Randolph, we hope to stimulate the senses, ignite inner passion and compel our visitors to share the things that inspire them with the world. Just as our artists do.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birminghammuseums.jpeg
Birmingham Museums Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mint-museum.jpeg
The Mint Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Birmingham Museums Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Mint Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Birmingham Museums Trust in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Mint Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Birmingham Museums Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Birmingham Museums Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Mint Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Mint Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birminghammuseums.jpeg
Birmingham Museums Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mint-museum.jpeg
The Mint Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Birmingham Museums Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Mint Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Mint Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Birmingham Museums Trust company.

In the current year, The Mint Museum company and Birmingham Museums Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor Birmingham Museums Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor Birmingham Museums Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor Birmingham Museums Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust company nor The Mint Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust nor The Mint Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust company nor The Mint Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Birmingham Museums Trust company employs more people globally than The Mint Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust nor The Mint Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust nor The Mint Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust nor The Mint Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust nor The Mint Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust nor The Mint Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Birmingham Museums Trust nor The Mint Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H