Comparison Overview

Birmingham Rail

VS

Milwaukee Composites, Inc.

Birmingham Rail

P O Box 530157, Birmingham, Alabama, 35253, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Birmingham Rail has been a trusted partner to the railroad and industrial markets for over a century. With more than 125 years of experience, we provide a comprehensive range of products and services, specializing in new and relay rail, track materials, crane rail, and accessories. From our 40-acre manufacturing facility in Lipscomb, Alabama, and our distribution center in Houston, Texas, we serve customers nationwide. Our Bessemer, Alabama location is dedicated to manufacturing high-quality switch material for distributors, contractors, and industrial clients.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Milwaukee Composites, Inc.

6055 S. Pennsylvania Ave., Cudahy, WI, 53110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Milwaukee Composites, Inc. (MCI) designs and manufactures patented phenolic products for mass transit vehicles. MCI phenolic composite products are lightweight, firesafe moisture resistant and maintenance free. Now in our 25th year​,​ we are proud to say that our products have never failed. Our company has supplied over 8.5 million square feet of floors, ceilings and doors in more than 20 U.S. states and across three continents. Clients include Brookville Equipment, Bombardier, Kawasaki, Siemens, London Underground, New York Transit, Chicago Metra and Gillig.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-rail-&-locomotive-co-.jpeg
Birmingham Rail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/milwaukee-composites.jpeg
Milwaukee Composites, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Birmingham Rail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Milwaukee Composites, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Birmingham Rail in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Milwaukee Composites, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Birmingham Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Birmingham Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Milwaukee Composites, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Milwaukee Composites, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-rail-&-locomotive-co-.jpeg
Birmingham Rail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/milwaukee-composites.jpeg
Milwaukee Composites, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Birmingham Rail company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Birmingham Rail company.

In the current year, Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company and Birmingham Rail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company nor Birmingham Rail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company nor Birmingham Rail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company nor Birmingham Rail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Birmingham Rail company nor Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Milwaukee Composites, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Birmingham Rail company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company.

Milwaukee Composites, Inc. company employs more people globally than Birmingham Rail company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Milwaukee Composites, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Milwaukee Composites, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Milwaukee Composites, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Milwaukee Composites, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Milwaukee Composites, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Birmingham Rail nor Milwaukee Composites, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H