Comparison Overview

Birmingham Parent Magazine

VS

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP

Birmingham Parent Magazine

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.birminghamparent.com/

Birmingham Parent targets parents from all walks of life and all areas of the community. Editorial content serves expectant parents, moms and dads of infants, toddlers, adolescents and teens, and grandparents helping raise grandchildren. Birmingham Parent crosses all faiths and all cultural barriers to reach the one central goal for every parent - raising happy, healthy, productive children. Birmingham Parent is an indispensable monthly resource for parents in and around Birmingham. Member of Parenting Publications of America.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP

PO BOX 726, None, GREEN FOREST, Arkansas, US, 72638
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://newleafpublishinggroup.com

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP, INC is a Christian publishing company offering biblical homeschool curriculum as well as theology, creation science, and apologetics resources to help defend your faith. Since 1975, our mission has been "Ink on Paper to Touch Eternity." New Leaf Publishing Group, Inc. is the parent company of the Master Books, New Leaf Press, and Attic Books imprints. Homeschool families and Christian organizations rely on MasterBooks.com for K-12 curriculum and educational resources that defend a biblical worldview and six-day account of creation. New Leaf Press offers books to inspire your Christian faith. Attic Books provides Christian classics and unedited accounts of history that line up with the biblical timeline.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-parent-magazine.jpeg
Birmingham Parent Magazine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-leaf-publishing-group-inc.jpeg
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Birmingham Parent Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Birmingham Parent Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP in 2025.

Incident History — Birmingham Parent Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Birmingham Parent Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-parent-magazine.jpeg
Birmingham Parent Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-leaf-publishing-group-inc.jpeg
NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Birmingham Parent Magazine company and NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Birmingham Parent Magazine company.

In the current year, NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company and Birmingham Parent Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor Birmingham Parent Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor Birmingham Parent Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company nor Birmingham Parent Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine company nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP company employs more people globally than Birmingham Parent Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Birmingham Parent Magazine nor NEW LEAF PUBLISHING GROUP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References