Comparison Overview

Birmingham Maple Clinic

VS

The Motherhood Center of New York

Birmingham Maple Clinic

2075 W Big Beaver Rd, Troy, 48084, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Since 1973 Birmingham Maple Clinic’s therapists have been providing mental health services designed to meet the needs of individuals, couples, families, groups and the Metro-Detroit community. Birmingham Maple Clinic comprises the most highly experienced and qualified professionals in the fields of Psychiatry, Psychology and Social Work. After many years of experience in other agencies, hospitals and private practice, clinicians have chosen to join Birmingham Maple Clinic to continue their advanced professional practices. The clinic is nationally accredited by the Council On Accreditation.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Motherhood Center of New York

205 Lexington Avenue , New York, New York, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Motherhood Center of New York is a comprehensive Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorder (PMAD) treatment center for new and expecting mothers/birthing parents. Our treatment services include our one-of-a-kind Day Program, Outpatient Services, and Support Groups. Our Day Program is the ideal level of care to help new and expecting mothers/birthing people that are having a difficult time caring for themselves and/or their baby to feel much better – much faster. Our Day Program is the only New York State Office of Mental Health Article 31 Perinatal Partial Hospitalization Program. Outpatient Services at The Motherhood Center consist of evaluation, therapy, medication management, and trying to conceive consultations. Our Support Groups offer a safe space for pregnant and postpartum birthing people to talk openly about the challenging parts of pregnancy and postpartum. The real truth is motherhood is hard. At The Motherhood Center – we make space for it all.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-maple-clinic.jpeg
Birmingham Maple Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-motherhood-center-of-new-york.jpeg
The Motherhood Center of New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Birmingham Maple Clinic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Motherhood Center of New York
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Birmingham Maple Clinic in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Motherhood Center of New York in 2026.

Incident History — Birmingham Maple Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Birmingham Maple Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Motherhood Center of New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Motherhood Center of New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birmingham-maple-clinic.jpeg
Birmingham Maple Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-motherhood-center-of-new-york.jpeg
The Motherhood Center of New York
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Birmingham Maple Clinic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Motherhood Center of New York company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Motherhood Center of New York company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Birmingham Maple Clinic company.

In the current year, The Motherhood Center of New York company and Birmingham Maple Clinic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Motherhood Center of New York company nor Birmingham Maple Clinic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Motherhood Center of New York company nor Birmingham Maple Clinic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Motherhood Center of New York company nor Birmingham Maple Clinic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic company nor The Motherhood Center of New York company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic nor The Motherhood Center of New York holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic company nor The Motherhood Center of New York company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Motherhood Center of New York company employs more people globally than Birmingham Maple Clinic company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic nor The Motherhood Center of New York holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic nor The Motherhood Center of New York holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic nor The Motherhood Center of New York holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic nor The Motherhood Center of New York holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic nor The Motherhood Center of New York holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Birmingham Maple Clinic nor The Motherhood Center of New York holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N