Comparison Overview

Bird Law Group, PC

VS

Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School

Bird Law Group, PC

2151 Michelson, Irvine, 92612, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Bird Law Group is a boutique law firm focused on providing outside general counsel services to small-to-medium sized businesses, emerging companies, startups, and entrepreneurs. Before joining BLG, our attorneys worked at "Big Law" firms in the securities, litigation, negotiations, federal criminal defense, advertising law, intellectual property, and complex business litigation fields. We take that experience and use it to help businesses get and stay compliant in highly regulated industries and be prepared for the future. BLG offers competitive rates and flexible pricing. Some services offered include flat rate formation packages, ongoing general counsel packages, and flexible payment plans.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School

122 Boylston Street, Jamaica Plain, MA, US, 02130
Last Update: 2025-11-30

Our Mission: We fight for fairness, justice, and legal, economic, and social change, by addressing our community’s civil legal needs and training the next generation of public interest lawyers. Our work is rooted in a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, and furthering racial justice. Our Practice Areas: The Legal Services Center assists over 1,000 clients each year with civil legal problems in a variety of substantive areas of law. We work in the areas of predatory lending and consumer protection, post-foreclosure eviction defense, family law, domestic violence, estate planning, disability benefits, and veterans legal services to provide a continuum of advocacy resources for our most vulnerable community members. Our In-House Clinics: Consumer Protection Clinic Family Justice Clinic Housing Law Clinic LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic Tax Litigation Clinic Veterans Law & Disability Benefits Clinic

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bird-law-group-pc.jpeg
Bird Law Group, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bird Law Group, PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bird Law Group, PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School in 2025.

Incident History — Bird Law Group, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bird Law Group, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bird-law-group-pc.jpeg
Bird Law Group, PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-services-center-of-harvard-law-school.jpeg
Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School
Incidents

FAQ

Bird Law Group, PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bird Law Group, PC company.

In the current year, Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company and Bird Law Group, PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company nor Bird Law Group, PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company nor Bird Law Group, PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company nor Bird Law Group, PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC company nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC company nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School company employs more people globally than Bird Law Group, PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bird Law Group, PC nor Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X