Comparison Overview

Bimo

VS

Kerry

Bimo

Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Blvd. Chefchaouni, Rue E Rte. 110, Ain Sebaa, Casablanca, 20250, Morocco ()212 0522 34 53 00, 212 0522 35 45 80 fax,

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,001-5,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kerry

undefined, Naas, undefined, undefined, IE
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Moderate

Between 600 and 700

Every day, millions of people throughout the world consume foods and beverages containing Kerryโ€™s taste and nutrition solutions. We are committed to making the world of food and beverage better for everyone, and dedicated to our Purpose, Inspiring Food, Nourishing Life. At Kerry, we are proud to provide our customers โ€“ some of the worldโ€™s best-known food, beverage and pharma brands โ€“ with the expertise, insights and know-how they need to deliver products that people enjoy and feel better about consuming. Kerry is a company rich in heritage and resources. Over the past five decades, our focus on changing lifestyles, the globalisation of food tastes and ever-evolving consumer needs has brought us to a market-leading global position. Today, we are firmly established as a world leader in the food, beverage and pharma industries, with 22,000+ staff and 150+ innovation and manufacturing centres across 30+ countries. Learn more about Kerry: www.kerry.com

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 15,972
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bimo.jpeg
Bimo
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kerry.jpeg
Kerry
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Bimo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kerry
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bimo in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kerry in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Bimo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bimo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Kerry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kerry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bimo.jpeg
Bimo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kerry.jpeg
Kerry
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bimo company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Kerry company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kerry company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bimo company.

In the current year, Kerry company and Bimo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kerry company nor Bimo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kerry company nor Bimo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kerry company nor Bimo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bimo company nor Kerry company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Kerry company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bimo company.

Kerry company employs more people globally than Bimo company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H