Comparison Overview

Billet Health

VS

beheld

Billet Health

6710 N 47th Ave, Glendale, Arizona, US, 85301
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Billet Health is a veteran-owned, nonprofit healthcare organization delivering coordinated care across every stage of life. We offer a full continuum of services - including home health, hospice, pharmacy, primary care, caregiving, chronic care, podiatry, dermatology, and more - all under one connected network. With 27 locations across 5 states, our mission is to make care feel seamless, personal, and truly supportive for patients and families navigating complex health needs. Born from service, Billet was founded by two veterans who saw the gaps in our healthcare system - and set out to build something better: ➡️ Care that meets people where they are ➡️ Services that work together, not in silos ➡️ A team that treats every patient like family We partner closely with hospitals, discharge planners, and community health providers to ensure patients receive timely, high-quality care in the comfort of home - and that families never feel lost in the system. If you believe healthcare should be more human — you belong in the Billet network.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

beheld

street, Austin, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Partnering with health plans to tackle their biggest challenges, Beheld leverages its empathetically talented workforce and innovative technology to source unique insights from member populations to improve outcomes, quality metrics and cost savings. Through the power of consistent, science-backed human connection via regular phone-based communication, Beheld’s Sunshine Connections program engages members beyond the clinical setting to deliver non-medical interventions that improve the health of members. Beheld prioritizes human connection, opening the door to authentic conversations that unlock actionable insights, behavior change and improved outcomes.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/billet-health.jpeg
Billet Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beheldhealth.jpeg
beheld
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Billet Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
beheld
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Billet Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for beheld in 2025.

Incident History — Billet Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Billet Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — beheld (X = Date, Y = Severity)

beheld cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/billet-health.jpeg
Billet Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beheldhealth.jpeg
beheld
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Billet Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to beheld company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, beheld company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Billet Health company.

In the current year, beheld company and Billet Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither beheld company nor Billet Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither beheld company nor Billet Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither beheld company nor Billet Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Billet Health company nor beheld company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Billet Health nor beheld holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Billet Health company nor beheld company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Billet Health company employs more people globally than beheld company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Billet Health nor beheld holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Billet Health nor beheld holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Billet Health nor beheld holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Billet Health nor beheld holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Billet Health nor beheld holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Billet Health nor beheld holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H