Comparison Overview

Togetherall

VS

Partnership for Children

Togetherall

undefined, London, UK, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

We’ve spent more than 16 years building a safe online community for members to take control, get support, and feel better. People come to Togetherall for support with a wide range of mental health and wellbeing issues – from anxiety, depression, loneliness, isolation, and stress, to relationship problems, and other life challenges. The safety of our members and clinical rigour is at the core of what we do, and we have a network of licensed mental health practitioners providing 24/7/365 support around the world. ✔ Peer-to-peer community– giving and receiving mutual support helps with acceptance, self-esteem, hope, and possibility for change. Togetherall is an affordable and safe way to deliver peer support options to a range of populations. ✔ Safe– licensed mental health practitioners facilitate, moderate, detect risk, and intervene 24/7/365. They create a safe and supportive environment for all. ✔ Scalable– a cost-effective, population-level resource to discuss life’s ups and downs that everyone can use. An ideal early intervention/preventative measure or to expand your support capacity. ✔ Reach underserved populations – reach individuals who don’t typically seek help Togetherall is available to over 20 million people across the US, UK, Canada, Ireland, and New Zealand and is commissioned in the NHS, government departments, public health, higher education institutions, as well as through employers and third-party organisations. We are passionate about building partnerships with organisations that meet different needs within an overall care pathway, highlighted by our alliances with ProtoCall Services & the ‘Wellness Together’ initiative across Canada. We have won a variety of awards, most recently the Tech4Good award for outstanding social impact mission at the Investor Allstars.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Partnership for Children

Partnership for Children, Hampton Wick, Surrey, KT1 4AS, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Download our brand new self-efficacy activities: https://t.co/rZdTigDqta Partnership for Children is an independent charity which promotes the mental health and emotional wellbeing of children, both in the UK and in many countries around the world. We produce evidence-based programmes for primary schools that help young children around the world to communicate effectively, cope with their anxieties and difficulties, and to develop skills for life. We also produce free resources for families to help promote children’s resilience. The programmes are based around stories, and the resources contain full lesson plans, posters, activity sheets and children’s items required to deliver the sessions. There are many ways to get involved in our work – from running one of our programmes in your school, becoming a trainer, becoming an international partner so that you can run our programmes in your country or supporting our work with a donation. We are a partnership of like-minded people and organisations who are passionate about the importance of good mental health for children around the world – please do get in touch if you would like to get involved.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-white-wall.jpeg
Togetherall
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/partnership-for-children.jpeg
Partnership for Children
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Togetherall
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Partnership for Children
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Togetherall in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Partnership for Children in 2026.

Incident History — Togetherall (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Togetherall cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Partnership for Children (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Partnership for Children cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-white-wall.jpeg
Togetherall
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/partnership-for-children.jpeg
Partnership for Children
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Togetherall company and Partnership for Children company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Partnership for Children company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Togetherall company.

In the current year, Partnership for Children company and Togetherall company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Partnership for Children company nor Togetherall company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Partnership for Children company nor Togetherall company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Partnership for Children company nor Togetherall company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Togetherall company nor Partnership for Children company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Togetherall nor Partnership for Children holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Togetherall company nor Partnership for Children company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Togetherall company employs more people globally than Partnership for Children company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Togetherall nor Partnership for Children holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Togetherall nor Partnership for Children holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Togetherall nor Partnership for Children holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Togetherall nor Partnership for Children holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Togetherall nor Partnership for Children holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Togetherall nor Partnership for Children holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N