Comparison Overview

Big Sky Studios

VS

EA Photography

Big Sky Studios

29-31 Brewery Road, London, undefined, N7 9QH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Big Sky Studios is central London's largest full-service creative campus with 15 studios across 5 sites. Our 4,348sqm campus on Brewery Road houses 10 fully-equipped photography studios, plus a panoramic rooftop studio. Other locations across our campus include Hoxton and Kings Cross. We’ve worked hard to build our reputation as not only a highly efficient space for shooting, but also as a place where you and your team are well looked after. With a genuine passion for what they do, our friendly and knowledgeable team are always happy to help. So whether you need studio space, equipment, catering, set build, or post-production – just ask.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EA Photography

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

EA Photography specializes in bespoke images for wedding, special events, portraiture, fine art, and travel. The company is the result of a lifelong passion for photography. Realizing this passion early on the photographer, Emily Asche, has worked over the past 10 years learning and perfecting her art. Never one to settle for "good enough", Emily continues to study and learn from previous shoots and seeks out new experiences that will expand her knowledge and repertoire to provide better images and more options for her clients. Having photographed on four continents in a variety of settings, EA Photography easily adapts to meet clients' needs and help realize their vision. The company's goal is to meet and exceed expectations, creating lasting images that will be cherished for generations.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-sky-studio.jpeg
Big Sky Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kroshka.jpeg
EA Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Big Sky Studios
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EA Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Sky Studios in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EA Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Big Sky Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Sky Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EA Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EA Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-sky-studio.jpeg
Big Sky Studios
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kroshka.jpeg
EA Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EA Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Big Sky Studios company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EA Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Big Sky Studios company.

In the current year, EA Photography company and Big Sky Studios company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EA Photography company nor Big Sky Studios company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EA Photography company nor Big Sky Studios company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EA Photography company nor Big Sky Studios company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Big Sky Studios company nor EA Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Big Sky Studios nor EA Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Big Sky Studios company nor EA Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Big Sky Studios company employs more people globally than EA Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Big Sky Studios nor EA Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Big Sky Studios nor EA Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Big Sky Studios nor EA Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Big Sky Studios nor EA Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Big Sky Studios nor EA Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Big Sky Studios nor EA Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N