Comparison Overview

BiG sign fx

VS

PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE

BiG sign fx

4865 Airway Dr, Central Point, Oregon, 97502, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

The Solution To All Of Your Digital Print Needs! We believe in building long lasting relationships with businesses of all sizes to help create the image that converts passersby into customers. We truly care about every client we work with because we don’t succeed unless you succeed. We will work with you every step of the way from design to installation to make sure you get exactly what you want in the timeframe you want it in. We are here to print dreams and build businesses!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE

ZA du Coutier, Cherré, France, FR, 72400
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Pusterla 1880 est un groupe cartotechnique au service de producteurs de biens de luxe. Spécialisé dans les boites et étuis haut de gamme de toutes formes, Pusterla 1880 propose des solutions techniques originales guidées par une forte culture de l'innovation et le respect de l'environnement. Grâce aux sites de production en Italie, France, Moldavie, Angleterre, Ecosse et Tunisie, Pusterla 1880 offre une grande autonomie système, garantissant une large couverture territoriale et le respect des délais de livraison.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-sign-fx.jpeg
BiG sign fx
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pusterla-1880-france.jpeg
PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BiG sign fx
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BiG sign fx in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE in 2025.

Incident History — BiG sign fx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BiG sign fx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-sign-fx.jpeg
BiG sign fx
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pusterla-1880-france.jpeg
PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BiG sign fx company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BiG sign fx company.

In the current year, PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company and BiG sign fx company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company nor BiG sign fx company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company nor BiG sign fx company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company nor BiG sign fx company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BiG sign fx company nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BiG sign fx nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BiG sign fx company nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE company employs more people globally than BiG sign fx company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither BiG sign fx nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BiG sign fx nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BiG sign fx nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BiG sign fx nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BiG sign fx nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BiG sign fx nor PUSTERLA 1880 FRANCE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N