Comparison Overview

Big Image Graphics

VS

TLF Graphics

Big Image Graphics

US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
www.bigpicture.net

Our goal is to help our customers tell their big story. We produce large format graphics that enable our customers to tell that story at their retail locations, on their fleet vehicles, at conferences - at any venue or location they can imagine. With a multi-national installation network we are able to meet our customer's needs wherever they may be, turning plain surfaces and unused spaces into messaging opportunities for small businesses to Fortune 500 corporations. Our experienced, long-tenured staff enhances project consistency and provides our customers a personal touch with top-notch professional capabilities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

TLF Graphics

235 Metro Park, Rochester, 14623, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tlfgraphics.com

TLF Graphics, located in Rochester, New York, established and incorporated in 1980, has built a solid reputation for high quality Pressure Sensitive labels, Labeling Systems, and Screen Printed products. We print on films, foils, and papers, adhesive and non-adhesive materials using flexography, screen, and digital printing processes. TLF Graphics also installs and services automatic and semi-automatic labeling and imprinting systems. Our specialty is product decoration and informational labels that are vital for delivering your message. Our labels are specially designed to ensure their survival through a number of rough environments, from water and oil to extreme temperature. Whatever the product, we have the label! Thermal transfer, print and apply, decals, digital, small or large quantities, variable imaged labels, bar codes, database integration, outdoor labels, vinyl, heat and oil resistant, 8-color capabilities, die-cuts, and more. If you need it, we can print it - any size, any quantity. Our wide range of equipment lets us take on any job. Get in touch with us today about your printing and labeling needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-image-graphics.jpeg
Big Image Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tlf-graphics.jpeg
TLF Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Big Image Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TLF Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Image Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TLF Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Big Image Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Image Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TLF Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TLF Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-image-graphics.jpeg
Big Image Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tlf-graphics.jpeg
TLF Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Big Image Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TLF Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TLF Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Big Image Graphics company.

In the current year, TLF Graphics company and Big Image Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TLF Graphics company nor Big Image Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TLF Graphics company nor Big Image Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TLF Graphics company nor Big Image Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Big Image Graphics company nor TLF Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Big Image Graphics nor TLF Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Big Image Graphics company nor TLF Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TLF Graphics company employs more people globally than Big Image Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Big Image Graphics nor TLF Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Big Image Graphics nor TLF Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Big Image Graphics nor TLF Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Big Image Graphics nor TLF Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Big Image Graphics nor TLF Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Big Image Graphics nor TLF Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References