Comparison Overview

Big Apple Circus

VS

Parker Theatre

Big Apple Circus

235 Park Avenue, New York, 10003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

On July 18, 1977, Paul Binder and Michael Christensen founded the Big Apple Circus with its first performance in Battery Park City. They had recently returned from a street performing tour of Europe where they had been invited to participate in Annie Fratellini’s first production of her Nouveau Cirque in Dijon in the summer of 1975. German-based Circus-Theater Roncalli was founded in 1976 by Bernhard Paul and Andre Heller and comes from the same one-ring, traditional Nouveau Cirque style. Since 1981, Lincoln Center has been home to the Big Apple Circus. Here, in 1988, the Big Apple Circus first introduced New Yorkers to China’s modern circus tradition with The Big Apple Circus Meets the Monkey King, and, in 1994, welcomed the famous Swiss mime group in Grandma Meets Mummenschanz. This year, we welcome Circus-Theater Roncalli for its U.S. premier and a collaboration on an all new show, Journey to the Rainbow. Join us under the Big Top through January 15th, 2024!

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 154
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Parker Theatre

3605 South State Street, South Salt Lake, UT, 84115, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

About Us ADMINISTRATION Executive Director: James Parker Chief Operations Officer: Paul Petersen Utah Children's Theatre (501c3) was founded in 1985, with a mission to create an environment for families to bring young people to experience and engage in live theatre. Every year a portion of our plays are original works written specifically for our audiences. Mainstage: Performances usually by adults, but age appropriate depending on the story. Drama Classes: Instruction in acting, voice and other techniques for ages 4 -19. Fieldtrips: Weekday performances booked by school groups. In June of 2011, the historic Avalon movie theatre was purchased and an extensive remodeling project commenced with an opening of April 2012.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-apple-circus.jpeg
Big Apple Circus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-theatre.jpeg
Parker Theatre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Big Apple Circus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Parker Theatre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Apple Circus in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parker Theatre in 2025.

Incident History — Big Apple Circus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Apple Circus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Parker Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parker Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-apple-circus.jpeg
Big Apple Circus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-theatre.jpeg
Parker Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Parker Theatre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Big Apple Circus company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Parker Theatre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Big Apple Circus company.

In the current year, Parker Theatre company and Big Apple Circus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Parker Theatre company nor Big Apple Circus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Parker Theatre company nor Big Apple Circus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Parker Theatre company nor Big Apple Circus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Big Apple Circus company nor Parker Theatre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Big Apple Circus nor Parker Theatre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Big Apple Circus company nor Parker Theatre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Big Apple Circus company employs more people globally than Parker Theatre company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Big Apple Circus nor Parker Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Big Apple Circus nor Parker Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Big Apple Circus nor Parker Theatre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Big Apple Circus nor Parker Theatre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Big Apple Circus nor Parker Theatre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Big Apple Circus nor Parker Theatre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N