Comparison Overview

BIFMA

VS

Actona Group A/S

BIFMA

678 Front Ave. NW, Ste. 150, Grand Rapids, MI, 49504-5368, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

BIFMA is the not-for-profit trade association for business and institutional furniture manufacturers. Since 1973, BIFMA has been the voice of the commercial furniture industry. On behalf of our members and the commercial furniture industry at large, BIFMA: DEVELOPS safety, performance, and sustainability standards that define product performance EDUCATES stakeholders on the importance of standards ADVOCATES for regulatory conditions that enhance value and foster innovation TRACKS market data and changes affecting our industry PROVIDES feedback from the market directly to our members CONVENES thought leaders and builds a community of advocates

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Actona Group A/S

Smedegårdvej 6, Holstebro, DK, 7500
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Actona Group is an ambitious global furniture partner with three brands: Sits, Flexlux, and Actona. Each brand has its own range and identity, but being part of Actona Group means all brands share the same vision to be the most value-adding global furniture partner. While being represented all over the world, Actona Group is based in Denmark, and our headquarters, showroom, and one of two European distribution centres are located right outside the city of Holstebro. We have 6 upholstery production sites located in Poland, Lithuania, China, and Ukraine. In addition to our three brands, we specialise in crafting modern furniture for private furniture brands.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 301
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bifma.jpeg
BIFMA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actona-group-as.jpeg
Actona Group A/S
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BIFMA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Actona Group A/S
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BIFMA in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Actona Group A/S in 2025.

Incident History — BIFMA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BIFMA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Actona Group A/S (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Actona Group A/S cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bifma.jpeg
BIFMA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actona-group-as.jpeg
Actona Group A/S
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Actona Group A/S company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BIFMA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Actona Group A/S company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BIFMA company.

In the current year, Actona Group A/S company and BIFMA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Actona Group A/S company nor BIFMA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Actona Group A/S company nor BIFMA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Actona Group A/S company nor BIFMA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BIFMA company nor Actona Group A/S company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BIFMA nor Actona Group A/S holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Actona Group A/S company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BIFMA company.

Actona Group A/S company employs more people globally than BIFMA company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither BIFMA nor Actona Group A/S holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BIFMA nor Actona Group A/S holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BIFMA nor Actona Group A/S holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BIFMA nor Actona Group A/S holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BIFMA nor Actona Group A/S holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BIFMA nor Actona Group A/S holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.