Comparison Overview

BHcare

VS

Behavioral Learning Network

BHcare

127 Washington Avenue, North Haven, 06473, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

BHcare is a Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic serving the Lower Naugatuck Valley, Greater New Haven, and Shoreline communities. For more than 40 years, BHcare has been providing hope and help for individuals, families and children affected by mental illness, domestic violence and substance use disorders. BHcare is licensed by the Department of Public Health, the Department of Children and Families, and is nationally accredited by The Joint Commission. The BHcare family of services includes: The Umbrella Center for Domestic Violence Services, the Hope Family Justice Center, The Parent Child Resource Center and The Alliance for Prevention & Wellness. In December 2019, BHcare, together with Fair Haven Community Health Care, opened Shoreline Family Health Care, an integrated care center for children and families where primary care clinicians and behavioral health professionals work together as a team to improve a family's overall health and wellness.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 244
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Behavioral Learning Network

5435 Balboa Boulevard, Encino, 91316, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Behavioral Learning Network was founded in 2013 to meet the growing need for quality behavior intervention services for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral Learning Network provides one-to-one services in the home, community or school setting as well as assessments and consultation services in California, Oregon, and New Hampshire. Behavioral Learning Network is contracted with several insurance agencies, school districts and vendorized with California Regional Centers to provide direct and consultation services. Behavioral Learning Network is directed by Dr. Gregory M. Elsky, a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT) and Board Certified Behavior Analyst-Doctorate (BCBA-D). Since 1995, Dr. Elsky has provided behavioral intervention for individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities. He has studied/trained under some of the leading experts in the field of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) including Dr. O. Ivaar Lovaas, Dr. Gary W. LaVigna, and Dr. Thomas J. Willis. As an active member of the California ABA community, Dr. Elsky has served/currently serves as a board member of the California Association for Applied Behavior Analysis (CalABA) and served as a Content Area Leader for the Behavior Analyst Certification Board's (BACB) Practice Guidelines for Autism Spectrum Disorders. Additionally, he has graduate level training in the administration and interpretation of a wide range of standardized psychological assessments as well as Behavioral Assessments, and as an adjunct faculty member, taught graduate level coursework in ABA at National University.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 141
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhcare.jpeg
BHcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/behavioral-learning-network-llc.jpeg
Behavioral Learning Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BHcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Behavioral Learning Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BHcare in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Behavioral Learning Network in 2026.

Incident History — BHcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BHcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Behavioral Learning Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Behavioral Learning Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhcare.jpeg
BHcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/behavioral-learning-network-llc.jpeg
Behavioral Learning Network
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both BHcare company and Behavioral Learning Network company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Behavioral Learning Network company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BHcare company.

In the current year, Behavioral Learning Network company and BHcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Behavioral Learning Network company nor BHcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Behavioral Learning Network company nor BHcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Behavioral Learning Network company nor BHcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BHcare company nor Behavioral Learning Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BHcare nor Behavioral Learning Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BHcare company nor Behavioral Learning Network company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BHcare company employs more people globally than Behavioral Learning Network company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither BHcare nor Behavioral Learning Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BHcare nor Behavioral Learning Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BHcare nor Behavioral Learning Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BHcare nor Behavioral Learning Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BHcare nor Behavioral Learning Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BHcare nor Behavioral Learning Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N