Comparison Overview

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

VS

Transport for London

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

1275 Peachtree St NE, Atlanta, Georgia, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bgca.org

Boys & Girls Clubs of America does whatever it takes for America’s youth to have great futures. As the nation's premier (nonprofit) youth development organization, our programs, training and services support millions of kids and teens every year. We hire employees who are recognized as leaders in their field with a passion for improving young lives. We have strong values, embrace diversity and offer great benefits to allow our employees to maintain work/life harmony. Boys & Girls Clubs of America represents the national office, which supports more than 1,000 independent Boys & Girls Club organizations serving youth across more than 5,400 locations. Boys & Girls Clubs are located in cities, towns, public housing and on Native lands throughout the country, and serve military families in BGCA-affiliated Youth Centers on U.S. military installations worldwide. Learn more about us at BGCA.org. Our Mission To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. Our Values Integrity Collaboration Accountability Respect Excellence

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,959
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Transport for London

5 Endeavour Square, Westfield Avenue,, London , E20 1JN, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 550 and 599
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/about

Every day, we help millions of people to make journeys across London: By Tube, bus, tram, car, bike – and more. People don’t associate us with journeys by river, on foot or via the air, but we help with that, too. Getting people to where they need to go has been our business for over 100 years, and it shows. We’re leaders in our field, and no other city’s transport system is quite as recognisable: Red buses, black taxis, Tube trains and roundels have become icons in their own right. Our main job is to keep the city moving, working and growing but to do that, we have to listen. Constant improvements across the network are fuelled by feedback and comments from customers, as well as work within communities, representative groups, businesses and other London transport stakeholders. But our progress also depends on technology and data. With the future at our fingertips, we’ve already used it to revolutionise travel payments (think Oyster and contactless payment cards), and improved travel information. Tech and data is essential, not just to our future, but to others’: third parties use our data to power apps and services vital to customer journeys. So what’s next? As well as continuing to deliver Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan’s strategy and commitments on transport, our programme of capital investments is still one of the largest. We launched the Elizabeth line, we’re modernising services and stations and making travel safer for all.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18,421
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bgcaclubs.jpeg
Boys & Girls Clubs of America
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-london.jpeg
Transport for London
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boys & Girls Clubs of America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transport for London
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boys & Girls Clubs of America in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport for London in 2026.

Incident History — Boys & Girls Clubs of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boys & Girls Clubs of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transport for London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bgcaclubs.jpeg
Boys & Girls Clubs of America
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-london.jpeg
Transport for London
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unauthorized use of computer systems (TfL), Zero-Day Exploit in Oracle E-Business Suite Servers (Oracle)
Motivation: Unclear (potentially disruption or data theft for TfL), Financial gain / extortion (Oracle)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown (likely exploit of exchange vulnerabilities or credential compromise)
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Boys & Girls Clubs of America company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transport for London company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transport for London company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Boys & Girls Clubs of America company has not reported any.

In the current year, Transport for London company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Transport for London company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Boys & Girls Clubs of America company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Transport for London company nor Boys & Girls Clubs of America company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Transport for London company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Boys & Girls Clubs of America company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America company nor Transport for London company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor Transport for London holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Transport for London company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Boys & Girls Clubs of America company.

Transport for London company employs more people globally than Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor Transport for London holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor Transport for London holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor Transport for London holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor Transport for London holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor Transport for London holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor Transport for London holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References