Comparison Overview

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

VS

British Council

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

1275 Peachtree St NE, Atlanta, Georgia, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bgca.org

Boys & Girls Clubs of America does whatever it takes for America’s youth to have great futures. As the nation's premier (nonprofit) youth development organization, our programs, training and services support millions of kids and teens every year. We hire employees who are recognized as leaders in their field with a passion for improving young lives. We have strong values, embrace diversity and offer great benefits to allow our employees to maintain work/life harmony. Boys & Girls Clubs of America represents the national office, which supports more than 1,000 independent Boys & Girls Club organizations serving youth across more than 5,400 locations. Boys & Girls Clubs are located in cities, towns, public housing and on Native lands throughout the country, and serve military families in BGCA-affiliated Youth Centers on U.S. military installations worldwide. Learn more about us at BGCA.org. Our Mission To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. Our Values Integrity Collaboration Accountability Respect Excellence

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,959
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

British Council

1 Redman Place, Stratford, London, England, GB, SW1A 2BN
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799
http://www.britishcouncil.org

We support peace and prosperity by building connections, understanding and trust between people in the UK and countries worldwide. We uniquely combine the UK’s deep expertise in arts and culture, education and the English language, our global presence and relationships in over 100 countries, our unparalleled access to young people and influencers and our creative sparkle. We work directly with individuals to help them gain the skills, confidence and connections to transform their lives and shape a better world in partnership with the UK. We support them to build networks and explore creative ideas, to learn English, to get a high-quality education and to gain internationally recognised qualifications. For more information, please visit: http://www.britishcouncil.org

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 24,041
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bgcaclubs.jpeg
Boys & Girls Clubs of America
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-council.jpeg
British Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boys & Girls Clubs of America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
British Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boys & Girls Clubs of America in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Council in 2026.

Incident History — Boys & Girls Clubs of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boys & Girls Clubs of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — British Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bgcaclubs.jpeg
Boys & Girls Clubs of America
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-council.jpeg
British Council
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Boys & Girls Clubs of America company and British Council company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

British Council company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Boys & Girls Clubs of America company has not reported any.

In the current year, British Council company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither British Council company nor Boys & Girls Clubs of America company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

British Council company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Boys & Girls Clubs of America company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither British Council company nor Boys & Girls Clubs of America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America company nor British Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor British Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

British Council company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Boys & Girls Clubs of America company.

British Council company employs more people globally than Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor British Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor British Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor British Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor British Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor British Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boys & Girls Clubs of America nor British Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References