Comparison Overview

BFC

VS

J&M Printing

BFC

1051 N. Kirk Rd., Batavia, IL, 60510, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

BFC utilizes an integrated & innovative approach to print and digital marketing. We are experts in marketing fulfillment services, field sales support and 3PL pick, pack & fulfillment solutions. Our kitting capabilities can handle simple item consolidation to complicated product builds. BFC is a family owned high-powered solution provider behind your brand.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

J&M Printing

407 Highway 13 East, Gwinner, ND, 58040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Since 1964, J&M Printing has provided local, regional and national clients with quality printing and related services. J&M Printing possesses a philosophy of continued growth, offering existing and new clients alike, the most current communications and print technologies. Much more than a print shop, J&M Printing is a proven one-stop communication center with the ability to offer everything from design, print, signage, and mailing services all under one name. Now, how many other printing companies can say that? At J&M Printing we consciously strive every day to provide excellence in a variety of communication fields. Our experienced staff can help you fine-tune your marketing message while also providing methods of delivering that message. Proving time again that quality is second nature. With over 45 years in the printing business, J&M is the print company you can trust!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bfc-print.jpeg
BFC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j&m-printing.jpeg
J&M Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BFC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
J&M Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BFC in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J&M Printing in 2025.

Incident History — BFC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BFC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — J&M Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J&M Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bfc-print.jpeg
BFC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j&m-printing.jpeg
J&M Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both BFC company and J&M Printing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, J&M Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BFC company.

In the current year, J&M Printing company and BFC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither J&M Printing company nor BFC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither J&M Printing company nor BFC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither J&M Printing company nor BFC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BFC company nor J&M Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BFC nor J&M Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BFC company nor J&M Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BFC company employs more people globally than J&M Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither BFC nor J&M Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BFC nor J&M Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BFC nor J&M Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BFC nor J&M Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BFC nor J&M Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BFC nor J&M Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N