Comparison Overview

Beyond Violence

VS

Joint Venture Silicon Valley

Beyond Violence

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Beyond Violence as an online movement and global network fighting for non-violent conflict transformation. Beyond Violence listens to the voices of people caught in conflict zones, and connects people all over the world- coming together as one powerful voice calling for peace. Beyond Violence uses the internet as a platform to engage in conflict resolution. Using Beyond Violence's forum, victims of conflict from opposing sides can be connected and can engage in mediating and healing discussion in a safe and anonymous space.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Joint Venture Silicon Valley

undefined, San Jose, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Joint Venture Silicon Valley is a think tank created and supported by the major sectors (business, government, labor and academia). Through the Institute for Regional Studies, the organization provides research assessing the Valley's challenges and opportunities; Joint Venture is also a platform where leaders develop shared priorities and take collaborative action. For more information, visit www.jointventure.org. Interact with Silicon Valley's online data hub at www.SiliconValleyIndicators.org.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beyond-violence.jpeg
Beyond Violence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joint-venture-silicon-valley-network.jpeg
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beyond Violence
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beyond Violence in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joint Venture Silicon Valley in 2025.

Incident History — Beyond Violence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beyond Violence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Joint Venture Silicon Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joint Venture Silicon Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beyond-violence.jpeg
Beyond Violence
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joint-venture-silicon-valley-network.jpeg
Joint Venture Silicon Valley
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Beyond Violence company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joint Venture Silicon Valley company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Beyond Violence company.

In the current year, Joint Venture Silicon Valley company and Beyond Violence company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley company nor Beyond Violence company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley company nor Beyond Violence company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Joint Venture Silicon Valley company nor Beyond Violence company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beyond Violence company nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beyond Violence nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Joint Venture Silicon Valley company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Beyond Violence company.

Joint Venture Silicon Valley company employs more people globally than Beyond Violence company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Beyond Violence nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beyond Violence nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beyond Violence nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beyond Violence nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beyond Violence nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beyond Violence nor Joint Venture Silicon Valley holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X