Comparison Overview

Beverly Hospital

VS

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Beverly Hospital

85 Herrick Street, Beverly, 01915, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Beverly Hospital, part of Beth Israel Lahey Health, is a full service, community hospital providing quality, patient-centered care to North Shore and Cape Ann residents. Services include maternity, pediatrics, surgical, orthopedics, cardiology, rehabilitation as well as other specialties. The hospital boasts a medical staff of more than 600 physicians and its service area includes 13 communities. Addison Gilbert Hospital is a full-service, 79-bed medical acute care facility located in Gloucester, Massachusetts. The hospital was founded in 1889 and to this day provides state-of-the-art inpatient and outpatient care to residents of the Cape Ann community. Beverly and Addison Gilbert Hospitals are a member of Lahey Health.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,469
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Av. Paulista 867, São Paulo, 01311-100, BR
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Com cerca de 80 anos de experiência, a Hapvida é hoje a maior empresa de saúde integrada da América Latina. A companhia, que possui mais de 69 mil colaboradores, atende quase 16 milhões de beneficiários de saúde e odontologia espalhados pelas cinco regiões do Brasil. Todo o aparato foi construído a partir de uma visão voltada ao cuidado de ponta a ponta, a partir 87 hospitais, 77 prontos atendimentos, 341 clínicas médicas e 291 centros de diagnóstico por imagem e coleta laboratorial, além de unidades especificamente voltadas ao cuidado preventivo e crônico. Dessa combinação de negócios, apoiada em qualidade médica e inovação, resulta uma empresa com os melhores recursos humanos e tecnológicos para os seus clientes.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 36,300
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beverly-hospital.jpeg
Beverly Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapvida.jpeg
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beverly Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beverly Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica in 2026.

Incident History — Beverly Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beverly Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beverly-hospital.jpeg
Beverly Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2014
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapvida.jpeg
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Beverly Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Beverly Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company and Beverly Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company nor Beverly Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company nor Beverly Hospital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company nor Beverly Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beverly Hospital company nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beverly Hospital nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Beverly Hospital company nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company employs more people globally than Beverly Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Beverly Hospital nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beverly Hospital nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beverly Hospital nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beverly Hospital nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beverly Hospital nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beverly Hospital nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H