Comparison Overview

Beusa Energy

VS

Ukrnafta

Beusa Energy

undefined, undefined, undefined, 77380, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Beusa Energy is an experienced management team focused on E&P Operations, Fracturing Services Operations, Turbine Power Solutions and Materials and Logistics Services in the U.S.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ukrnafta

3-5 Nestorivskyi prov. Kyiv, 04053, UA
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

โ€“รญโ€“โˆ‚โ€“ยต โ€“ยฑโ€”รฑโ€“ยชโ€”รฅโ€”ร โ€“ยต 70 โ€”ร„โ€“รฆโ€“โˆซโ€”รฑโ€“โ‰ค ยฌยดUkrnaftaยฌยช โ€”รฎ โ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆžโ€“ฯ€โ€“ยฑโ€”รฑโ€“ยชโ€”รฅโ€”ร โ€“รฆโ€”รฉ โ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆžโ€”ร‘โ€”ร‡โ€“รฆโ€“โ‰ฅโ€“โˆžโ€“โˆ‘โ€“รฆโ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆโ€“ยฅโ€“รฆโ€“ยฑโ€”ร‰โ€“โ‰คโ€“โ„ฆโ€“รฆโ€”รฉ โ€“โˆซโ€“รฆโ€“ยบโ€“รธโ€“โˆžโ€“โ„ฆโ€”รฑโ€”รฎโ€”รฉ โ€“ยฃโ€“โˆซโ€”ร„โ€“โˆžโ€”รณโ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆ, โ€“โ‰ค โ€”ร…โ€“โˆซโ€“ยชโ€“โˆžโ€“ยฅโ€”รฑ โ€”รจโ€“โˆซโ€“รฆโ€”รณ โ€“รธโ€“ยตโ€”ร„โ€“ยตโ€“ยฑโ€”ร‰โ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆžโ€”รฉโ€”ร‡โ€”รฅ 1791 โ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆžโ€”ร‘โ€”ร‡โ€“รฆโ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆโ€”ร– โ€”ร‡โ€“โˆž 147 โ€“โ‰ฅโ€“โˆžโ€“โˆ‘โ€“รฆโ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆโ€”ร– โ€”ร…โ€“โ‰คโ€“ยตโ€”ร„โ€“ยฅโ€“ยชโ€“รฆโ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆโ€“โ„ฆ, โ€“โˆž โ€”ร‡โ€“โˆžโ€“โˆซโ€“รฆโ€“โˆ‚ โ€“ยฑโ€”รฑโ€“ยชโ€”รฅโ€”ร โ€“ยต 500 โ€“ยบโ€“รฆโ€“โ„ฆโ€“รฆโ€“ยฑโ€”ร„โ€“ยตโ€“โ„ฆโ€“ยฅโ€“รฆโ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆโ€”ร– โ€“รชโ€“รณโ€“ยฐ UKRNAFTA โ€“ยบโ€“โˆžโ€“ฯ€โ€“โˆ‚โ€“ยต โ€“โ‰ค โ€”ร‰โ€”ร…โ€”รฑโ€”ร– โ€”ร„โ€“ยตโ€“โ‰ฅโ€”รฑโ€“รฆโ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆžโ€”ร– โ€“ยฃโ€“โˆซโ€”ร„โ€“โˆžโ€”รณโ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆ. โ€“รญโ€”ร…โ€“ยต โ€”รœโ€“ยต โ€“ยบโ€“รฆโ€“โˆ‚โ€“ยชโ€“โˆโ€“โ‰คโ€“รฆ โ€“โˆ‘โ€“โˆžโ€“โ‰คโ€“ยฅโ€”รจโ€“โˆซโ€“โˆ โ€“ยชโ€”รฉโ€“ยฅโ€”รจโ€“ยบ, โ€”รจโ€“โˆซโ€”รฑ โ€“รธโ€”ร„โ€“โˆžโ€”รœโ€”รฉโ€”รฉโ€”ร‡โ€”รฅ โ€“โ‰ค โ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆžโ€”ร โ€”รฑโ€“ฯ€ โ€“โˆซโ€“รฆโ€“ยบโ€“โˆžโ€“โ„ฆโ€“ยฅโ€”รฑ โ€šร„รฎ โ€”ร…โ€“โˆโ€“ยชโ€”รฅโ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆโ€“ยบ, โ€“โ‰คโ€”รฑโ€“ยฅโ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆžโ€“โˆ‚โ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆโ€“ยบ, โ€”ร„โ€”รฑโ€”ร โ€”ร‰โ€”รกโ€“โˆโ€“ยบ, โ€”รฑโ€“โ„ฆโ€“โ„ฆโ€“รฆโ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆžโ€”รœโ€”รฑโ€“ฯ€โ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆโ€“ยบ โ€”ร‡โ€“โˆž โ€“รฆโ€“ยฑ'โ€”รฎโ€“ยฅโ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆžโ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆโ€“ยบ โ€”ร…โ€“รธโ€”รฑโ€“ยชโ€”รฅโ€“โ„ฆโ€“รฆโ€”รฉ โ€“ยบโ€“ยตโ€”ร‡โ€“รฆโ€”รฉ. โ€“รญโ€“ยตโ€“ยชโ€“โˆโ€“โˆซโ€“โˆž โ€“โˆซโ€“รฆโ€“ยบโ€“โˆžโ€“โ„ฆโ€“ยฅโ€“โˆž #UkrnaftaPeople โ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆžโ€“ยชโ€”รฑโ€”รกโ€”ร‰โ€”รฎ โ€“ยบโ€“โˆžโ€“ฯ€โ€“โˆ‚โ€“ยต 20 000 โ€“โˆซโ€“รฆโ€“ยชโ€“ยตโ€“โ‰ฅ โ€“รธโ€“รฆ โ€“โ‰คโ€”ร…โ€”รฑโ€“ฯ€ โ€“ยฃโ€“โˆซโ€”ร„โ€“โˆžโ€”รณโ€“โ„ฆโ€”รฑ. โ€“ยฐโ€“ยชโ€”รฑโ€“ยฅโ€“โˆซโ€”ร‰โ€“ฯ€โ€”ร‡โ€“ยต โ€“โˆ‘โ€“โˆž โ€“โ„ฆโ€“รฆโ€“โ‰คโ€“โˆโ€“โ„ฆโ€“โˆžโ€“ยบโ€“โˆ โ€“โˆ‘ โ€“โˆ‚โ€“โˆโ€”ร‡โ€”ร‡โ€”รจ โ€“โˆซโ€“รฆโ€“ยบโ€“รธโ€“โˆžโ€“โ„ฆโ€”รฑโ€”รณ โ€”ร‡โ€“โˆž โ€“รธโ€”ร„โ€“โˆโ€”รฎโ€“ยฅโ€“โ„ฆโ€”ร‰โ€“ฯ€โ€”ร‡โ€“ยตโ€”ร…โ€”รฅ โ€“ยฅโ€“รฆ โ€“โˆซโ€“รฆโ€“ยบโ€“โˆžโ€“โ„ฆโ€“ยฅโ€“โˆ #UkrnaftaPeople

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beusa-energy.jpeg
Beusa Energy
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ukrnafta.jpeg
Ukrnafta
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Beusa Energy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ukrnafta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beusa Energy in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ukrnafta in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Beusa Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beusa Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Ukrnafta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ukrnafta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beusa-energy.jpeg
Beusa Energy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ukrnafta.jpeg
Ukrnafta
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Beusa Energy company and Ukrnafta company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ukrnafta company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Beusa Energy company.

In the current year, Ukrnafta company and Beusa Energy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ukrnafta company nor Beusa Energy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ukrnafta company nor Beusa Energy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ukrnafta company nor Beusa Energy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beusa Energy company nor Ukrnafta company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beusa Energy company nor Ukrnafta company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Beusa Energy company employs more people globally than Ukrnafta company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N