Comparison Overview

Beusa Energy

VS

aramco

Beusa Energy

undefined, undefined, undefined, 77380, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Beusa Energy is an experienced management team focused on E&P Operations, Fracturing Services Operations, Turbine Power Solutions and Materials and Logistics Services in the U.S.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

aramco

P.O. Box 5000, Dhahran, undefined, 31311, SA
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Weโ€™re a leading producer of the energy and chemicals that drive global commerce and enhance the daily lives of people around the globe by continuing delivering an uninterrupted supply of energy to the world. Our resilience and agility has built one of the worldโ€™s largest integrated energy and chemicals companies. And we are part of the global effort toward building a low carbon economy. Our horizon has never been clearer.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 152,474
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beusa-energy.jpeg
Beusa Energy
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saudi-aramco.jpeg
aramco
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Beusa Energy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
aramco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beusa Energy in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for aramco in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Beusa Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beusa Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” aramco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

aramco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beusa-energy.jpeg
Beusa Energy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saudi-aramco.jpeg
aramco
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Cyber warfare, industrial espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Beusa Energy company and aramco company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

aramco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Beusa Energy company has not reported any.

In the current year, aramco company and Beusa Energy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither aramco company nor Beusa Energy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither aramco company nor Beusa Energy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

aramco company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Beusa Energy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Beusa Energy company nor aramco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beusa Energy company nor aramco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

aramco company employs more people globally than Beusa Energy company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N