Comparison Overview

Bethel Haven

VS

Intermountain

Bethel Haven

1622 Mars Hill Rd, Watkinsville, Georgia, 30677, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Bethel Haven, Inc is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to provide help, hope and healing to distressed individuals. As a Christian non-profit organization, Bethel Haven is dedicated to serving our community through quality, professional therapeutic services that are led from a biblical approach and are affordable for all clients. We strive to address the needs of the whole person recognizing the biological, social, psychological and spiritual components which make up an individual in a collaborative relationship between a therapist and client that is based upon mutual respect and agreed upon treatment goals. Who We Serve When Bethel Haven, Inc was founded in 2007, our initial focus was to serve children and young people. As our counselors understand relational dynamics and the unique issues associated with the developmental and transitional periods of life, we have expanded our focus to address other community needs by serving individuals in all life stages. Our counselors are equipped to help clients across the lifespan with a range of difficulties such as: Anxiety, depression, uncontrollable anger Poor behavioral choices and self-harm School problems Eating disorders Self-esteem and body-image concerns Relational problems Difficulty with forgiveness Questions of faith PTSD and trauma

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Intermountain

3240 Dredge Dr, Helena, Montana, 59602, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Intermountain is a visionary non-profit agency that has been impacting the lives of children and families in Montana for over 100 years. With holistic, integrated services and a relationship-based approach, we help families create and sustain nurturing, healthy environments where children can thrive and grow. Intermountain has grown over the years to add adults and telehealth services. Today, we serve hundreds of clients each day across Montana through a variety of services, including outpatient therapy, residential treatment, speech therapy, occupational therapy, co-occurring services, psychiatric medication management, case management, and school-based services.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 225
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bethel-haven.jpeg
Bethel Haven
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intermountainmt.jpeg
Intermountain
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bethel Haven
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Intermountain
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bethel Haven in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intermountain in 2026.

Incident History — Bethel Haven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bethel Haven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Intermountain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intermountain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bethel-haven.jpeg
Bethel Haven
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intermountainmt.jpeg
Intermountain
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Intermountain company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bethel Haven company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Intermountain company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bethel Haven company.

In the current year, Intermountain company and Bethel Haven company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Intermountain company nor Bethel Haven company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Intermountain company nor Bethel Haven company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Intermountain company nor Bethel Haven company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bethel Haven company nor Intermountain company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bethel Haven nor Intermountain holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bethel Haven company nor Intermountain company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Intermountain company employs more people globally than Bethel Haven company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Bethel Haven nor Intermountain holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bethel Haven nor Intermountain holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bethel Haven nor Intermountain holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bethel Haven nor Intermountain holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bethel Haven nor Intermountain holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bethel Haven nor Intermountain holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N