Comparison Overview

Beth Perkins Photography

VS

Photo Nanny

Beth Perkins Photography

None
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

Freelance photographer represented by Renee Rhyner www.reneerhyner.com I photograph people and places for editorial stories and advertising. My clients include Amerigroup, Exelon Patch through the ad agency Deutsch, Liberty Mutual through the ad agency Hill Holiday, Glamour Magazine, Wired Magazine, Inc. Magazine, Newsweek, Ladies Home Journal, Travel and Leisure Golf and many more.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Photo Nanny

2909 Hillcroft, Suite 230, Houston, 77057, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

We organize, scan and digitize photos and memorabilia. From cluttered chaos, we create custom photo memories ranging from custom slide shows, custom coffee table books telling a person or company's story or simply digitized, sorted files on external drives. With white glove service, we transform jumbled prints and digital files into sorted and easily searchable folders and archival storage. Through consultation with clients one on one, we teach them to use their cameras and tricks and tools for staying on track. We also offer Safetynet offsite digital file storage to help keep their memorabilia safe and ready to deliver in the event of any emergency.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-perkins-photography.jpeg
Beth Perkins Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photo-nanny.jpeg
Photo Nanny
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beth Perkins Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Photo Nanny
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Perkins Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Photo Nanny in 2025.

Incident History — Beth Perkins Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Perkins Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Photo Nanny (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Photo Nanny cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-perkins-photography.jpeg
Beth Perkins Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photo-nanny.jpeg
Photo Nanny
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Beth Perkins Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Photo Nanny company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Photo Nanny company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Beth Perkins Photography company.

In the current year, Photo Nanny company and Beth Perkins Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Photo Nanny company nor Beth Perkins Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Photo Nanny company nor Beth Perkins Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Photo Nanny company nor Beth Perkins Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography company nor Photo Nanny company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography nor Photo Nanny holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography company nor Photo Nanny company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Photo Nanny company employs more people globally than Beth Perkins Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography nor Photo Nanny holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography nor Photo Nanny holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography nor Photo Nanny holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography nor Photo Nanny holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography nor Photo Nanny holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beth Perkins Photography nor Photo Nanny holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N