Comparison Overview

Bestia

VS

Studio Six Branding

Bestia

Aguirre 1153 3ºA, Núñez, CABA, C1429CYE, AR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Bestia nace como excusa para darle vida al proyecto BestiaMag (www.bestiamag.com), un colectivo multidisciplinario con base en la ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hoy en día, luego de crear una comunidad integrada por más de 350 artistas y diseñadores de alrededor del mundo, decidimos abrir las puertas de Bestia como estudio integral de diseño. Bestia es un estudio que brinda soluciones comunicacionales haciendo foco en la calidad visual, acompañada de ideas innovadoras y creativas. Tenemos la capacidad de analizar las necesidades específicas de cada proyecto, procesarlas y generar una propuesta integral para resolverlas. Tomamos cada proyecto como propio para darle una mirada personal, con el fin de conseguir resultados únicos y efectivos. We are the Beast!

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio Six Branding

1114 Neon Forest Circle #6, Longmont, CO, US, 80504
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Words + Pictures We have a little love affair with both. Neither seems to mind. What We Do If you can see, hear or smell it, we’ve branded it. Transit Systems. Signs & Wayfinding Systems. Transit Fleets. Social Media. Logos. Names. Taglines. Community Visioning. Brochures. Maps. Wall Graphics. Branded Interiors. Philippe Starck, make room. Retail Displays. ATMs. Packaging. Events. Scripts. Moving Billboards. Radio. Video. Luxury Hotels. And that’s only the beginning. What Makes Us Unique Our core area of expertise is developing dynamic, modern brands for transit systems and municipalities. With over 30 years of branding experience, we have rebranded entire cities, launched transit systems, increased ridership, reshaped negative perceptions, increased revenue, and designed brands that attract raving fans! Areas of Expertise Transit Branding, City Branding, Stakeholder Facilitation, Destination Branding, Economic Development, Tourism, Wayfinding, Community Visioning, Behavior Change Campaigns

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bestia.jpeg
Bestia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studiosixbranding.jpeg
Studio Six Branding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bestia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio Six Branding
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bestia in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio Six Branding in 2025.

Incident History — Bestia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bestia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio Six Branding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio Six Branding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bestia.jpeg
Bestia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studiosixbranding.jpeg
Studio Six Branding
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bestia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio Six Branding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio Six Branding company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bestia company.

In the current year, Studio Six Branding company and Bestia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio Six Branding company nor Bestia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio Six Branding company nor Bestia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio Six Branding company nor Bestia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bestia company nor Studio Six Branding company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bestia nor Studio Six Branding holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bestia company nor Studio Six Branding company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Studio Six Branding company employs more people globally than Bestia company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Bestia nor Studio Six Branding holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bestia nor Studio Six Branding holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bestia nor Studio Six Branding holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bestia nor Studio Six Branding holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bestia nor Studio Six Branding holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bestia nor Studio Six Branding holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X