Comparison Overview

BestCode

VS

Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd

BestCode

3034 SE Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

BestCode designs and manufactures coding and marking printing systems and associated fluids, supplies and accessories. BestCode industrial printing systems print real-time lot/date, sell-by dates, expiration dates and other identifying marks on industrial and consumer goods to ensure product traceability. Products are designed and manufactured in the USA; Fort Worth, Texas. For over 25 years, the BestCode group continues to produce industry changing, forward thinking innovative industrial printing designs. Product designs are focused on ease of use, trouble free operation, long term reliability, and affordable cost of ownership with an emphasis on global market requirements.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd

Thorn Business Park, Hereford , HR2 6, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We are a family business and all we know is signs! Actually, if we put it a different way, we know how to make yours get noticed, to make them stand out from the crowd. Sometimes that comes from design. Just as often it comes from our experience of materials, shapes and printing. We can happily print simple signs or displays. But to see us really excited, tell us your challenge, tell us you want something distinctive, innovative, better. If you know it now please pick up the phone!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bestcode.jpeg
BestCode
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signshereford.jpeg
Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BestCode
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BestCode in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — BestCode (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BestCode cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bestcode.jpeg
BestCode
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signshereford.jpeg
Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both BestCode company and Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BestCode company.

In the current year, Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company and BestCode company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company nor BestCode company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company nor BestCode company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company nor BestCode company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BestCode company nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BestCode nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BestCode company nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BestCode company employs more people globally than Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither BestCode nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BestCode nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BestCode nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BestCode nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BestCode nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BestCode nor Signs & Labels Hereford Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N