Comparison Overview

Best Value Copy

VS

Cedinsa SA

Best Value Copy

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

We have been in the industry for 20+ years and have learned what small businesses and organizations need: honesty, quality, low prices and fast delivery. A few years ago we decided we wanted to offer our service online, after all, who likes waiting in line at a big chain or local shop, do all that travelling, getting poor quality and then paying a high price? Answer: Nobody. That's why we created BestValueCopy.com, so no matter where you are or who you are you can get the best quality printing for a low price. Big chain and local shops have smaller, lower quality machines but we employ a fleet of Fortune 500 high quality machines for everybody and anybody to use for their printing needs all at price that's affordable. Whether your a small business, organization, charity, at home or in the office BestValueCopy.com has what you need.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cedinsa SA

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

CEDINSA S.A es una Empresa con más de 20 años de experiencia en el mercado de las impresiones especiales. Fabricamos y comercializamos Tarjetas Telefónicas y/o Pre-pago, Tickets Magnéticos, Tarjetas C-less, y otros productos afines. Productos de excelencia, equipamiento de última generación, y procesos de Control, nos permiten ofrecer un servicio ágil, confiable y de alta gama. Priorizamos una atención personalizada, fundada sobre la base de una relación permanente y dinámica, que permita el crecimiento de ambas partes. Concentramos nuestros esfuerzos en maximizar la reducción de costos, brindando soluciones competitivas y funcionales, a la medida de cada cliente. Operamos tanto en mercados nacionales, como internacionales.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-value-copy.jpeg
Best Value Copy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedinsa-sa.jpeg
Cedinsa SA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Best Value Copy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cedinsa SA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Value Copy in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedinsa SA in 2025.

Incident History — Best Value Copy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Value Copy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cedinsa SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedinsa SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-value-copy.jpeg
Best Value Copy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedinsa-sa.jpeg
Cedinsa SA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cedinsa SA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Best Value Copy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cedinsa SA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Best Value Copy company.

In the current year, Cedinsa SA company and Best Value Copy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cedinsa SA company nor Best Value Copy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cedinsa SA company nor Best Value Copy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cedinsa SA company nor Best Value Copy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Best Value Copy company nor Cedinsa SA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Best Value Copy nor Cedinsa SA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Best Value Copy company nor Cedinsa SA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cedinsa SA company employs more people globally than Best Value Copy company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Best Value Copy nor Cedinsa SA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Best Value Copy nor Cedinsa SA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Best Value Copy nor Cedinsa SA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Best Value Copy nor Cedinsa SA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Best Value Copy nor Cedinsa SA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Best Value Copy nor Cedinsa SA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N