Comparison Overview

Best Law Offices, P.C.

VS

Eversheds Sutherland SA

Best Law Offices, P.C.

4500 Main Street, Virginia Beach, VA, 23462, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Best Law Offices, P.C. was established in 1998 by experienced attorneys dedicated to assisting business growth for U.S. and multinational companies through sound advice, strategic business planning, and determined litigation. Our goal is to make your business more successful. Part of our formula for success is the hands-on service we provide. As a small firm, our lawyers are in a position to take the time to get to know our clients well, treating them like friends, and gaining insights that allow us to anticipate where issues may arise. We work closely with our clients to help them accomplish their goals by providing a range of services typically found in larger firms.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eversheds Sutherland SA

3rd floor, 54 Melrose Boulevard, Johannesburg, 2196, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-30

Eversheds Sutherland SA is one of the leading full-service law firms in South Africa. As an affiliate of Eversheds Sutherland ( International) LLP we can provide clients with the same high standard of legal expertise. We are a progressive law firm, constantly on the look-out for better ways to provide creative and cost-effective legal and business solutions for our clients. Our approach is personal, combined with the highest professional standards. We have an extensive blue-chip client base of major domestic and international corporations, banks, financial institutions and state authorities. Our wealth of experience across a wide range of industries enables us to assist you with your own unique business challenges and other strategic issues that require legal insight. Eversheds Sutherland were named International Law Firm of the year and Litigation and Dispute Resolution team of the year at the African Legal Awards 2014. Every year, Eversheds Sutherland breaks new ground and is a firm that offers a clear alternative to those who want more from their lawyers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-law-offices.jpeg
Best Law Offices, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eversheds-sutherland-sa.jpeg
Eversheds Sutherland SA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Best Law Offices, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eversheds Sutherland SA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Law Offices, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eversheds Sutherland SA in 2025.

Incident History — Best Law Offices, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Law Offices, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eversheds Sutherland SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eversheds Sutherland SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-law-offices.jpeg
Best Law Offices, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eversheds-sutherland-sa.jpeg
Eversheds Sutherland SA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Best Law Offices, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eversheds Sutherland SA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eversheds Sutherland SA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Best Law Offices, P.C. company.

In the current year, Eversheds Sutherland SA company and Best Law Offices, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eversheds Sutherland SA company nor Best Law Offices, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eversheds Sutherland SA company nor Best Law Offices, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eversheds Sutherland SA company nor Best Law Offices, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Best Law Offices, P.C. company nor Eversheds Sutherland SA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Best Law Offices, P.C. nor Eversheds Sutherland SA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Eversheds Sutherland SA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Best Law Offices, P.C. company.

Eversheds Sutherland SA company employs more people globally than Best Law Offices, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Best Law Offices, P.C. nor Eversheds Sutherland SA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Best Law Offices, P.C. nor Eversheds Sutherland SA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Best Law Offices, P.C. nor Eversheds Sutherland SA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Best Law Offices, P.C. nor Eversheds Sutherland SA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Best Law Offices, P.C. nor Eversheds Sutherland SA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Best Law Offices, P.C. nor Eversheds Sutherland SA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X